• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗补助健康计划质量信息的公开报告。

Public reporting of quality information on Medicaid health plans.

作者信息

Felt-Lisk Suzanne, Barrett Allison, Nyman Rebecca

机构信息

Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., USA.

出版信息

Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):5-16.

PMID:17645152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4194989/
Abstract

Transparency through public reporting of quality data is key to achieving the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) vision for 21st century health care. This article reviews the status of States' voluntary public reporting of Medicaid managed care (MMC) quality data, and analyzes these data. Twenty-one States, including 17 of the 20 largest managed care States, have made plan-level data publicly available online, although the data are sometimes thin, with few measures reported, hard-to-access, and old. We conclude that CMS could better leverage the power of public reporting for quality improvement (QI) by increasing the visibility of health plan employer data and information set (HEDISV) data that States already collect.

摘要

通过公开报告质量数据实现透明化是达成医学研究所(IOM)对21世纪医疗保健愿景的关键。本文回顾了各州自愿公开报告医疗补助管理式医疗(MMC)质量数据的现状,并对这些数据进行了分析。包括20个最大的管理式医疗州中的17个在内的21个州已在网上公开了计划层面的数据,不过这些数据有时内容单薄,报告的指标较少,难以获取且陈旧过时。我们得出结论,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)可以通过提高各州已经收集的健康计划雇主数据和信息集(HEDISV)数据的可见性,更好地利用公开报告的力量来促进质量改进(QI)。

相似文献

1
Public reporting of quality information on Medicaid health plans.医疗补助健康计划质量信息的公开报告。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):5-16.
2
Perils of pioneering: monitoring Medicaid managed care.开拓的风险:监测医疗补助管理式医疗
Health Care Financ Rev. 2000 Winter;22(2):61-83.
3
Special report on reimbursement and health care delivery systems. HCFA publishes health care quality improvement system guidelines for state Medicaid managed care programs.关于报销与医疗服务提供系统的特别报告。医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)发布了针对州医疗补助管理式医疗计划的医疗质量改进系统指南。
Health Care Law Newsl. 1994 May;9(5):18-23.
4
Medicaid managed care and high quality. Can we have both?医疗补助管理式医疗与高质量。我们能二者兼得吗?
JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1617-21.
5
Reconciling practice and theory: challenges in monitoring Medicaid managed-care quality.调和实践与理论:医疗补助管理式医疗质量监测中的挑战
Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):85-105.
6
Quality of care for children in commercial and Medicaid managed care.商业保险和医疗补助管理式医疗中儿童的医疗服务质量。
JAMA. 2003 Sep 17;290(11):1486-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.11.1486.
7
Toward a 21st century quality-measurement system for managed-care organizations.迈向21世纪管理式医疗组织的质量测量系统。
Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):25-37.
8
The evolution of quality management in state Medicaid agencies: a national survey of states with comprehensive managed care programs.州医疗补助机构质量管理的演变:对实施全面管理式医疗计划的州进行的全国性调查。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Feb;28(2):72-82. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28007-4.
9
Association Between Health Plan Exit From Medicaid Managed Care and Quality of Care, 2006-2014.2006 - 2014年医疗补助管理式医疗中退出医保计划与医疗质量之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2524-2531. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7118.
10
Quality management by state Medicaid agencies converting to managed care: plans and current practice.向管理式医疗转变的州医疗补助机构的质量管理:计划与当前实践
JAMA. 1998 Jan 21;279(3):211-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.3.211.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of electronic medical records data sources on an adverse drug event quality measure.电子病历数据源对药物不良事件质量衡量标准的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):185-91. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002451.
2
Medicaid consumers and informed decisionmaking.医疗补助计划消费者与明智决策
Health Care Financ Rev. 2009 Spring;30(3):25-40.

本文引用的文献

1
American's best health plans.美国最佳健康保险计划。
US News World Rep. 2006 Nov 6;141(17):68, 70, 72 passim.
2
The evolution of quality management in Medicaid managed care.医疗补助管理式医疗中质量管理的演变
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 Jul-Aug;23(4):245-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.4.245.
3
Do quality improvement strategies for Medicaid enrollees differ in Medicaid-dominant versus commercial managed care organizations?针对医疗补助计划参保者的质量改进策略在以医疗补助为主的组织与商业管理式医疗组织中有差异吗?
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Dec;9(12):806-16.
4
Variation in racial and ethnic differences in consumer assessments of health care.医疗保健消费者评估中种族和民族差异的变化。
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Jul;9(7):502-9.