• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Rehabilitation after high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental arthroplasty. A comparative study.

作者信息

Ivarsson I, Gillquist J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 May(266):139-44.

PMID:2019043
Abstract

Ten patients with medial gonarthrosis treated by unicompartmental arthroplasty were matched with ten patients who had high tibial osteotomy; their courses of rehabilitation were evaluated. All patients regained motion without problems, with no difference between the groups. Muscle torque was measured by a Cybex II dynamometer. The results six months postoperatively were better in the patients treated by unicompartmental arthroplasty than they were 12 months postoperatively in the patients treated by high tibial osteotomy. In the prosthesis group there was an increase in the maximal gait velocity and the duration of single support. In the osteotomy group there was no significant change. This difference in the results of rehabilitation constitutes an argument for arthroplasty in aged patients.

摘要

相似文献

1
Rehabilitation after high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental arthroplasty. A comparative study.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 May(266):139-44.
2
Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy.单髁膝关节置换术或高位胫骨截骨术失败后的全膝关节翻修术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Dec(321):10-8.
3
Unicompartmental arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthrosis of the knee. A comparative study with a 12- to 17-year follow-up period.膝关节骨关节炎的单髁关节置换术与高位胫骨截骨术:一项随访12至17年的对比研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 May(302):134-7.
4
Total knee arthroplasty after proximal tibial osteotomy.胫骨近端截骨术后全膝关节置换术。
Chir Organi Mov. 1995 Oct-Dec;80(4):353-9.
5
Mid-term results of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy.高位胫骨截骨术后全膝关节置换术的中期结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Feb;128(2):167-73. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0488-3. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
6
Improvement in gait one year after surgery for knee osteoarthrosis: a comparison between high tibial osteotomy and prosthetic replacement in a prospective randomized study.膝关节骨关节炎术后一年步态的改善:一项前瞻性随机研究中高位胫骨截骨术与假体置换术的比较
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1993 Mar;25(1):25-31.
7
[Total knee replacement following high tibial osteotomy].[胫骨高位截骨术后全膝关节置换]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003;70(3):158-63.
8
[A 20-year follow-up study of internal gonarthrosis after tibial valgus osteotomy. Single versus repeated osteotomy].[胫骨外翻截骨术后膝内翻的20年随访研究。单次截骨与重复截骨]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1996;82(3):241-50.
9
[Results of tibial valgus osteotomy for internal femoro-tibial arthritis with an average 8-year follow-up].
Acta Orthop Belg. 1994;60(2):163-9.
10
[Varus supracondylar osteotomy of the femur -- long-term results].[股骨髁上内翻截骨术——长期结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2005;72(6):363-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Versus High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 56,000 Patients.单髁膝关节置换术与高位胫骨截骨术治疗膝关节内侧骨关节炎的比较:对56000例患者的最新荟萃分析
Orthop Surg. 2025 Sep;17(9):2499-2513. doi: 10.1111/os.70049. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
2
Requirements of Patients Undergoing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Preparation for Discharge from the Hospital -A Qualitative Study.单髁膝关节置换术患者出院准备的需求——一项定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Mar 24;19:741-752. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S498119. eCollection 2025.
3
Simultaneous bilateral open wedge high tibial osteotomy versus simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the treatment of bilateral medial knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of an average three-year follow-up.
同期双侧开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术与同期双侧单髁膝关节置换术治疗双侧膝关节内侧骨关节炎:一项平均随访 3 年的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 28;19(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05080-5.
4
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis: A comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes.单髁膝关节置换术与高位胫骨截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎:临床和影像学结果比较
World J Orthop. 2024 May 18;15(5):444-456. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i5.444.
5
Comparison of Early Complication Rates After High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Knee Osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎的高位胫骨截骨术与单髁膝关节置换术后早期并发症发生率的比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jan 4;12(1):23259671231219975. doi: 10.1177/23259671231219975. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
What is the difference in proprioception between single condylar arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy? a comparative study on both knees of the same patient.单髁关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术之间本体感觉有何差异?一项对同一患者双膝的对比研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jul 6;18(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03965-5.
7
Comparative Analysis of Unicompartmental Total Knee Arthroplasty and High Tibial Osteotomy: Time to Total Knee Arthroplasty and Other Outcome Measures.单髁全膝关节置换术与高位胫骨截骨术的比较分析:至全膝关节置换术的时间及其他结局指标
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Feb 28;20:101107. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101107. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with lower pain levels but inferior range of motion, compared with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术相比,疼痛程度较低,但活动范围较小:荟萃分析的系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Sep 24;17(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03319-7.
9
High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高胫骨截骨术与单髁膝关节置换术治疗单髁膝关节骨关节炎的系统评价和Meta分析
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Mar 21;56(6):973-982. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00620-9. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Risk of Revision and Adverse Outcomes Following Partial Knee Replacement and High Tibial Osteotomy for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Cohort Study.单髁膝关节骨关节炎行部分膝关节置换术和高位胫骨截骨术后的翻修风险及不良结局:一项全国性队列研究。
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Sep 21;55(5):1101-1110. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00517-z. eCollection 2021 Oct.