Unosawa Satoshi, Hata Mitsumasa, Sezai Akira, Niino Tetsuya, Yoshitake Isamu, Shimura Kazuma, Takamori Tatsuya, Minami Kazutomo
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1 Ooyaguchi-kami-machi, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Aug;16(1):48-51.
We report a 65-year-old man with fulminant myocarditis undergoing percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) and left ventricular assist device (LVAD). PCPS and intra-aortic balloon pumping was initially introduced for cardiogenic shock in the emergency department. We switched to LVAD because cardiac function did not recover despite PCPS for 5 days. Cardiac function then gradually improved, and the device was successfully weaned after 11 days of the LVAD support. He was discharged on postoperative day 63 with no complications. We here report the appropriate timing of LVAD application for fulminant myocarditis.
我们报告了一名65岁患有暴发性心肌炎的男性患者,其接受了经皮心肺支持(PCPS)和左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗。PCPS和主动脉内球囊反搏最初是在急诊科用于心源性休克。由于尽管进行了5天的PCPS治疗,心脏功能仍未恢复,我们转而使用LVAD。此后心脏功能逐渐改善,在LVAD支持11天后成功撤机。他在术后第63天出院,无并发症。我们在此报告暴发性心肌炎应用LVAD的合适时机。