University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Jan 15;62(1):38-44. doi: 10.1002/acr.20012.
To investigate the construct validity of walking knee stiffness as a measure to differentiate between individuals with and without knee osteoarthritis (OA) and the construct validity of walking knee stiffness as related to self-reported knee stiffness. The contributors to walking stiffness and its relationship with loading rate and adduction moment are also investigated.
Thirty-seven individuals with knee OA and 11 asymptomatic controls participated. Knee stiffness was calculated during walking as the change in knee flexion-extension moment divided by the change in knee flexion angle. Forward-stepwise regression models and Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the relationships between variables.
Knee stiffness in walking was significantly greater in the OA group (mean +/- SD 10.1 +/- 4.4 Nm/ degrees /kg x 100) compared with the controls (mean +/- SD 5.6 +/- 1.5 Nm/degrees/kg x 100) (P < 0.001). Knee excursion range explained 39% of the variance in walking knee stiffness (B = -0.736, P < 0.001) and knee extensor moment a further 7% (B = 6.974, P = 0.045). In the OA group, walking knee stiffness was not associated with self-reported stiffness (r = 0.029; P = 0.863). For the OA group, greater self-reported stiffness was associated with lower peak knee adduction moment (B = -0.354, P < 0.001).
The construct validity of walking knee stiffness is supported. The poor correlation between walking stiffness and self-reported stiffness suggests the 2 measures evaluate different aspects of knee stiffness. Since a measure of walking stiffness is likely to provide valuable information, future research evaluating its clinical significance is merited.
探究步行膝关节僵硬作为一种区分膝骨关节炎(OA)患者和非 OA 患者的测量指标的结构效度,以及步行膝关节僵硬与自我报告膝关节僵硬的结构效度。还研究了步行僵硬的贡献因素及其与加载速率和内收力矩的关系。
37 名膝骨关节炎患者和 11 名无症状对照者参与了该研究。在步行过程中,通过计算膝关节屈伸力矩的变化与膝关节屈伸角度的变化之比来计算膝关节僵硬。采用逐步向前回归模型和 Pearson 相关系数来评估变量之间的关系。
OA 组的步行膝关节僵硬(平均±标准差 10.1±4.4 Nm/degrees/kg×100)明显高于对照组(平均±标准差 5.6±1.5 Nm/degrees/kg×100)(P<0.001)。膝关节活动范围解释了步行膝关节僵硬(B=-0.736,P<0.001)的 39%的方差,膝关节伸肌力矩进一步解释了 7%的方差(B=6.974,P=0.045)。在 OA 组中,步行膝关节僵硬与自我报告的僵硬程度无相关性(r=0.029,P=0.863)。对于 OA 组,自我报告的僵硬程度越大,峰值膝关节内收力矩越低(B=-0.354,P<0.001)。
步行膝关节僵硬的结构效度得到了支持。步行僵硬与自我报告僵硬程度之间的相关性较差,表明这两种测量方法评估了膝关节僵硬的不同方面。由于行走僵硬程度的测量可能提供有价值的信息,因此值得进一步研究其临床意义。