• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“心理学家的处方权:下一步”:勘误

"Prescriptive authority for psychologists: The next step": Correction.

作者信息

Curtis Steven Eric, Hoffmann Samantha, O'Leary Sloan Maeve

机构信息

PsyD Program in Clinical Psychology, Antioch University.

出版信息

Psychol Serv. 2023 May;20(2):381. doi: 10.1037/ser0000687. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1037/ser0000687
PMID:35816574
Abstract

Reports an error in "Prescriptive authority for psychologists: The next step" by Steven Eric Curtis, Samantha Hoffmann and Maeve O'Leary Sloan (, Advanced Online Publication, May 05, 2022, np). In the original article, changes were needed to clarify the timeline of state legalizations of prescriptive authority for psychologists (RxP) and the current status of RxP with regard to the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). In the second paragraph of the "RxP From 2011 to Present" section, the citations relating to legalization in Idaho and Iowa were corrected, and the year in the Prescribing Psychologist reference was corrected in the References section and in text citations throughout. Additionally, in the last paragraph of the "RxP From 2011 to Present" section, the text was updated to clarify that at the present time, prescribing psychologists are not able to prescribe for the BOP. All versions of this article have been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2022-58802-001). Since the endorsement of prescriptive authority for psychologists (RxP) by the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1995, it has become legal in five states (Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, and New Mexico). The Department of Defense, including the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army, and U.S. Navy, as well as the Public Health Service, and the Indian Health Service, continue to utilize prescribing psychologists as well. There are now over 200 prescribing psychologists in the United States. Five APA-designated RxP training programs offer a pathway to attain prescription privileges and future board certification when approved. The purpose of this article is to provide information for those with minimal exposure to RxP, updates for those more informed, and recommendations for the next phase of RxP. This article examines scholarship related to RxP as well as newsletter columns, state legislative efforts, current RxP laws, policies, training programs, and critical events in the RxP history. Public access to quality and comprehensive mental health services can be expected to improve as more psychologists complete the necessary RxP training and licensure requirements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

报告史蒂文·埃里克·柯蒂斯、萨曼莎·霍夫曼和梅芙·奥里利·斯隆所著的《心理学家的处方权:下一步》(2022年5月5日高级在线发表,无页码)中的一处错误。在原文中,需要进行修改以澄清各州赋予心理学家处方权(RxP)的合法化时间表以及RxP在联邦监狱管理局(BOP)方面的当前状况。在“2011年至今的RxP”部分的第二段中,与爱达荷州和爱荷华州合法化相关的引用进行了更正,并且在参考文献部分以及全文的文本引用中,“处方心理学家”参考文献中的年份也进行了更正。此外,在“2011年至今的RxP”部分的最后一段,文本进行了更新,以澄清目前处方心理学家无法为联邦监狱管理局开处方。本文的所有版本均已更正。(原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2022 - 58802 - 001中)。自1995年美国心理学会(APA)认可心理学家的处方权(RxP)以来,在五个州(爱达荷州、伊利诺伊州、爱荷华州、路易斯安那州和新墨西哥州)已合法化。国防部,包括美国空军、美国陆军和美国海军,以及公共卫生服务局和印第安卫生服务局,也继续使用处方心理学家。美国现在有超过200名处方心理学家。五个由美国心理学会指定的RxP培训项目提供了一条途径,在获得批准后可获得处方特权和未来的委员会认证。本文的目的是为那些对RxP接触较少的人提供信息,为那些了解较多的人提供更新内容,并为RxP的下一阶段提供建议。本文研究了与RxP相关的学术成果以及时事通讯专栏、州立法努力、当前的RxP法律、政策、培训项目以及RxP历史上的关键事件。随着更多心理学家完成必要的RxP培训和执照要求,预计公众获得高质量和全面心理健康服务的机会将会增加。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
"Prescriptive authority for psychologists: The next step": Correction.“心理学家的处方权:下一步”:勘误
Psychol Serv. 2023 May;20(2):381. doi: 10.1037/ser0000687. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
2
Prescriptive authority for psychologists: The next step.给心理学家的规定性权力:下一步。
Psychol Serv. 2023 May;20(2):363-381. doi: 10.1037/ser0000667. Epub 2022 May 5.
3
Effects of giving psychologists prescriptive authority: Evidence from a natural experiment in the United States.赋予心理学家处方权的效果:来自美国自然实验的证据。
Health Policy. 2023 Aug;134:104846. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104846. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
Prescribing privileges: grail for some practitioners, potential calamity for interprofessional collaboration in mental health.
J Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;58(6):681-96. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10053.
5
The case against prescription privileges for psychologists.反对赋予心理学家处方权的理由。
Am Psychol. 1996 Mar;51(3):207-12. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.51.3.207.
6
Predoctoral prescriptive authority curricula: a training option.研究生规培授权课程:一种培训选择。
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Mar;68(3):246-62. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20828. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
7
The revised 2019 standards for psychopharmacological training: Model education and training program in psychopharmacology for prescriptive authority.修订后的 2019 年精神药理学培训标准:精神药理学处方权的示范教育和培训计划。
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):154-164. doi: 10.1037/amp0000729. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
Prescriptive authority for psychologists.心理学家的规定权限。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:21-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-090209-151448.
9
Opposition to prescriptive authority: is this a case of the tail wagging the dog?对处方权的反对:这是本末倒置的情况吗?
J Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;58(6):623-33. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10060.
10
Evaluating the impact of prescriptive authority for psychologists on the rate of deaths attributed to mental illness.评估心理学家的规定性权力对归因于精神疾病的死亡率的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Apr;19(4):667-672. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Scope-of-Practice Expansions Associated with Reduced Racial Disparities in Pediatric Mental Health Care.实践范围的扩大与儿科心理健康护理中种族差异的减少有关。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Nov;60(8):1579-1588. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01310-6. Epub 2024 Jul 1.