Skea D L, Underdown B J
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Infect Immun. 1991 May;59(5):1733-8. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.5.1733-1738.1991.
A previous study from this laboratory (D. P. Snider, D. Skea, and B. J. Underdown, Infect. Immun. 56:2838-2842, 1988) indicated that immunodeficient mice expressing the xid gene develop prolonged infections with Giardia muris, unlike immunocompetent mice, which eliminate the intestinal protozoan parasite in 8 to 10 weeks. In this study, CBA/N (xid) and CBA/Ca mice were infected with G. muris cysts and at various times following this primary infection were cured by treatment with metronidazole. In contrast to the marked differences in the ability of xid and normal mice to eliminate a primary infection, mice of both strains were resistant to a secondary challenge of G. muris cysts. These data imply that the mechanism(s) responsible for elimination of a primary infection is not identical to those required to resist a secondary challenge infection. Splenocytes from immunocompetent CBA/Ca mice (but not immunodeficient CBA/N mice) could transfer the ability to eliminate a primary G. muris infection to irradiated mice of either strain. In contrast, splenocytes from previously infected CBA/Ca mice could not transfer resistance to a challenge infection, further supporting the hypothesis that there are differences between mechanisms required to eliminate a primary infection and those necessary to resist a second challenge infection.
本实验室先前的一项研究(D.P. 斯奈德、D. 斯基阿和B.J. 安德唐,《感染与免疫》56:2838 - 2842,1988年)表明,表达xid基因的免疫缺陷小鼠会发生持续时间较长的鼠贾第虫感染,这与免疫健全的小鼠不同,后者在8至10周内就能清除肠道原生动物寄生虫。在本研究中,CBA/N(xid)小鼠和CBA/Ca小鼠感染了鼠贾第虫包囊,在初次感染后的不同时间,用甲硝唑治疗将其治愈。与xid小鼠和正常小鼠清除初次感染能力上的显著差异相反,这两种品系的小鼠对鼠贾第虫包囊的二次攻击均具有抗性。这些数据表明,负责清除初次感染的机制与抵抗二次攻击感染所需的机制并不相同。免疫健全的CBA/Ca小鼠(而非免疫缺陷CBA/N小鼠)的脾细胞能够将清除初次鼠贾第虫感染的能力转移给两种品系经辐照的小鼠。相反,先前感染过的CBA/Ca小鼠的脾细胞无法转移对攻击感染的抗性,这进一步支持了以下假设:清除初次感染所需的机制与抵抗二次攻击感染所需的机制存在差异。