Département de Biochimie, Centre Robert-Cedergren, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Jul;27(7):1698-709. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq059. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
According to the chromalveolate hypothesis (Cavalier-Smith T. 1999. Principles of protein and lipid targeting in secondary symbiogenesis: euglenoid, dinoflagellate, and sporozoan plastid origins and the eukaryote family tree. J Eukaryot Microbiol 46:347-366), the four eukaryotic groups with chlorophyll c-containing plastids originate from a single photosynthetic ancestor, which acquired its plastids by secondary endosymbiosis with a red alga. So far, molecular phylogenies have failed to either support or disprove this view. Here, we devise a phylogenomic falsification of the chromalveolate hypothesis that estimates signal strength across the three genomic compartments: If the four chlorophyll c-containing lineages indeed derive from a single photosynthetic ancestor, then similar amounts of plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear sequences should allow to recover their monophyly. Our results refute this prediction, with statistical support levels too different to be explained by evolutionary rate variation, phylogenetic artifacts, or endosymbiotic gene transfer. Therefore, we reject the chromalveolate hypothesis as falsified in favor of more complex evolutionary scenarios involving multiple higher order eukaryote-eukaryote endosymbioses.
根据色线体假说(Cavalier-Smith T. 1999. 二次共生中蛋白质和脂质靶向的原则:眼虫、甲藻和孢子虫质体的起源和真核生物的系统发育。J Eukaryot Microbiol 46:347-366),四个含有叶绿素 c 的质体的真核生物群体源自一个单一的光合祖先,它通过与红藻的二次内共生获得了质体。到目前为止,分子系统发育学既没有支持也没有反驳这一观点。在这里,我们设计了一个对色线体假说的基因组假说来反驳它,该假说估计了三个基因组区室中的信号强度:如果这四个含有叶绿素 c 的谱系确实源自一个单一的光合祖先,那么相似数量的质体、线粒体和核序列应该能够恢复它们的单系性。我们的结果反驳了这一预测,支持水平的统计差异太大,无法用进化率变化、系统发育伪影或内共生基因转移来解释。因此,我们拒绝了色线体假说,转而支持更复杂的进化场景,涉及多个高等真核生物-真核生物内共生。