Suppr超能文献

三种多焦点人工晶状体的波前分析和调制传递函数。

Wavefront analysis and modulation transfer function of three multifocal intraocular lenses.

机构信息

Department of Cataract Surgery and Refractive Surgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(2):109-13. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.60075.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate wavefront performance and modulation transfer function (MTF) in the human eye after the implantation of diffractive or refractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, interventional, comparative, nonrandomized clinical study. Uncorrected distance and near visual acuity, and wavefront analysis including MTF curves (iTrace aberrometer, Tracey Technologies, Houston, TX, USA) were measured in 60 patients after bilateral IOL implantation with 6 months of follow-up. Forty eyes received the diffractive ReSTOR (Alcon), 40 eyes received the refractive ReZoom (Advanced Medical Optics) and 40 eyes, the Tecnis ZM900 (Advanced Medical Optics). The comparison of MTF and aberration between the intraocular lenses was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Dunn test when necessary.

RESULTS

The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was similar in all three groups of multifocal IOLs. The ReSTOR group provided better uncorrected near visual acuity than the ReZoom group (P<0.001), but similar to the Tecnis group. Spherical aberration was significantly higher in the ReZoom group (P=0.007). Similar MTF curves were found for the aspheric multifocal IOL Tecnis and the spheric multifocal IOL ReSTOR, and both performed better than the multifocal IOL ReZoom in a 5 mm pupil (P<0.001 at all spatial frequencies).

CONCLUSIONS

Diffractive IOLs studied presented similar MTF curves for a 5 mm pupil diameter. Both diffractive IOLs showed similar spherical aberration, which was significantly better with the full-diffractive IOL Tecnis than with the refractive IOL ReZoom.

摘要

目的

评估人眼在植入衍射或折射多焦点人工晶状体(IOL)后波前性能和调制传递函数(MTF)。

材料和方法

这是一项前瞻性、干预性、对比性、非随机的临床研究。60 例患者接受双侧 IOL 植入术后 6 个月,进行了未矫正的远距和近距视力以及波前分析,包括 MTF 曲线(iTrace 像差仪,Tracey Technologies,休斯顿,TX,美国)。40 只眼植入衍射型 ReSTOR(爱尔康),40 只眼植入折射型 ReZoom(先进医疗光学),40 只眼植入 Tecnis ZM900(先进医疗光学)。使用方差分析(ANOVA)比较人工晶状体之间的 MTF 和像差,必要时使用 Dunn 检验。

结果

三组多焦点 IOL 的平均未矫正远视力相似。ReSTOR 组的未矫正近视力优于 ReZoom 组(P<0.001),但与 Tecnis 组相似。ReZoom 组的球差明显较高(P=0.007)。Tecnis 非球面多焦点 IOL 和 ReSTOR 球面多焦点 IOL 的 MTF 曲线相似,两者在 5mm 瞳孔下的性能均优于 ReZoom 多焦点 IOL(所有空间频率下 P<0.001)。

结论

研究的衍射型 IOL 具有相似的 5mm 瞳孔直径 MTF 曲线。两种衍射型 IOL 的球差相似,全衍射型 IOL Tecnis 的球差明显优于折射型 IOL ReZoom。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fbd/2854440/d94d7f3582ac/IJO-58-109-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Wavefront analysis and modulation transfer function of three multifocal intraocular lenses.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(2):109-13. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.60075.
3
A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of multifocal lenses.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;248(1):133-40. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1177-4. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
4
One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
6
Performance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses in distance optical bench tests.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):166-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.026.
10
[Long-term clinical observation of aspheric multifocal intraocular lens implantation].
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Aug 11;53(8):599-609. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.08.008.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Diffractive Intraocular Lenses Using Near-Infrared Light: A Critical Evaluation.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2025 Jun 2;14(6):36. doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.6.36.
2
Optical aberrations, accommodation, and visual acuity with a bioanalogic continuous focus intraocular lens after cataract surgery.
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 29;29(4):274-281. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.06.007. eCollection 2017 Dec.
4
Visual performance with accommodating and multifocal intraocular lenses.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb 18;10(2):235-240. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.02.09. eCollection 2017.
5
Comparison of two types of visual quality analyzer for the measurement of high order aberrations.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb 18;9(2):292-7. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.02.22. eCollection 2016.
7
Visual function and higher order aberration after implantation of aspheric and spherical multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct 18;6(5):690-5. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.05.27. eCollection 2013.
8
Internal spherical aberration by ray tracing-type aberrometry in multifocal pseudophakic eyes.
Eye (Lond). 2012 Sep;26(9):1243-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.129. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Apodized diffractive versus refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: optical and visual evaluation.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Dec;34(12):2036-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.045.
2
Multifocal IOL technology: a successful step on the journey toward presbyopia treatment.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Dec;34(12):2005. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.10.011.
3
Maximizing satisfaction with presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: the missing links.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;146(5):641-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.07.033. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
4
One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep;115(9):1508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
6
Optical performance of monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses in the human eye.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 May;34(5):755-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.038.
10
Functional vision with bilateral ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lenses 6 months after cataract surgery.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Dec;33(12):2057-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.07.029.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验