Research Group Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 25;5(2):e9419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009419.
Deciphering the behavioral repertoire of great apes is a challenge for several reasons. First, due to their elusive behavior in dense forest environments, great ape populations are often difficult to observe. Second, members of the genus Pan are known to display a great variety in their behavioral repertoire; thus, observations from one population are not necessarily representative for other populations. For example, bonobos (Pan paniscus) are generally believed to consume almost no vertebrate prey. However, recent observations show that at least some bonobo populations may consume vertebrate prey more commonly than previously believed. We investigated the extent of their meat consumption using PCR amplification of vertebrate mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) segments from DNA extracted from bonobo feces. As a control we also attempted PCR amplifications from gorilla feces, a species assumed to be strictly herbivorous.
We found evidence for consumption of a variety of mammalian species in about 16% of the samples investigated. Moreover, 40% of the positive DNA amplifications originated from arboreal monkeys. However, we also found duiker and monkey mtDNA in the gorilla feces, albeit in somewhat lower percentages. Notably, the DNA sequences isolated from the two ape species fit best to the species living in the respective regions. This result suggests that the sequences are of regional origin and do not represent laboratory contaminants.
Our results allow at least three possible and mutually not exclusive conclusions. First, all results may represent contamination of the feces by vertebrate DNA from the local environment. Thus, studies investigating a species' diet from feces DNA may be unreliable due to the low copy number of DNA originating from diet items. Second, there is some inherent difference between the bonobo and gorilla feces, with only the later ones being contaminated. Third, similar to bonobos, for which the consumption of monkeys has only recently been documented, the gorilla population investigated (for which very little observational data are as yet available) may occasionally consume small vertebrates. Although the last explanation is speculative, it should not be discarded a-priori given that observational studies continue to unravel new behaviors in great ape species.
由于在茂密的森林环境中难以观察到大型猿类的行为,因此破译它们的行为模式是一个挑战。其次,众所周知,黑猩猩属的成员在行为模式方面表现出很大的多样性;因此,一个种群的观察结果不一定代表其他种群。例如,人们普遍认为倭黑猩猩(Pan paniscus)几乎不吃脊椎动物猎物。然而,最近的观察表明,至少一些倭黑猩猩种群可能比以前认为的更经常地食用脊椎动物猎物。我们使用从黑猩猩粪便中提取的 DNA 进行 PCR 扩增来检测脊椎动物线粒体 DNA(mtDNA)片段,以此来研究它们的肉类消费程度。作为对照,我们还尝试从大猩猩粪便中进行 PCR 扩增,因为大猩猩被认为是严格的草食性动物。
我们从所研究的样本中约 16%的样本中发现了食用多种哺乳动物的证据。此外,40%的阳性 DNA 扩增来自树栖猴子。然而,我们也在大猩猩粪便中发现了麂和猴子的 mtDNA,但百分比略低。值得注意的是,从两种类人猿物种中分离出的 DNA 序列与生活在各自地区的物种最匹配。这一结果表明,这些序列来自于该地区,而不是实验室污染物。
我们的研究结果至少可以得出三种可能且相互不排斥的结论。首先,所有的结果都可能代表粪便被当地环境中的脊椎动物 DNA 污染。因此,从粪便 DNA 研究一个物种的饮食可能是不可靠的,因为源自饮食的 DNA 数量很少。其次,黑猩猩和大猩猩的粪便之间存在一些内在的差异,只有后者被污染。第三,类似于最近才被记录到吃猴子的倭黑猩猩,我们所研究的大猩猩种群(目前关于这个种群的观察数据很少)可能偶尔会吃小型脊椎动物。尽管最后一种解释是推测性的,但在观察性研究继续揭示大型猿类新行为的情况下,不应先验地排除这种解释。