• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心血管结局对治疗糖尿病药物的研发和批准的影响。

Impact of cardiovascular outcomes on the development and approval of medications for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.

机构信息

Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, USA.

出版信息

Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2010 Mar;11(1):21-30. doi: 10.1007/s11154-010-9130-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11154-010-9130-8
PMID:20195772
Abstract

All medications currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus are indicated to improve glycemic control. Since 1995, FDA has used HbA1c as the primary basis for approval of these therapies because a reduction in blood glucose lessens the symptoms of hyperglycemia and lowering of HbA1c has been shown to reduce the risk for some of the chronic complications of diabetes. Despite evidence of clinical benefit with therapies that reduce HbA1c, concerns have been raised that some diabetes medications may increase cardiovascular risk in a patient population that is already vulnerable to cardiovascular disease. Therefore, FDA convened a public advisory committee meeting to discuss the role of cardiovascular assessment in the pre-approval and post-approval settings for medications developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. After considering the advisory panel's recommendations and other data, FDA published a guidance document requesting evidence showing that new treatments for type 2 diabetes do not result in an unacceptable increase in cardiovascular risk. This review article begins by summarizing the events leading up to publication of this guidance. Subsequent sections discuss the guidance itself as well as general considerations for implementing the new cardiovascular recommendations. The new approach to developing medications for the treatment of type 2 diabetes will lead to evaluation in patients more representative of those who will use these therapies, if approved, and will help healthcare providers make informed decisions when choosing a medication within the growing treatment armamentarium for type 2 diabetes.

摘要

所有目前获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗 2 型糖尿病的药物均被指示可改善血糖控制。自 1995 年以来,FDA 一直将 HbA1c 作为批准这些疗法的主要依据,因为降低血糖可以减轻高血糖的症状,并且降低 HbA1c 已被证明可以降低某些糖尿病慢性并发症的风险。尽管有证据表明降低 HbA1c 的疗法具有临床益处,但有人担心某些糖尿病药物可能会增加已经易患心血管疾病的患者群体的心血管风险。因此,FDA 召集了一次公开咨询委员会会议,讨论心血管评估在用于治疗 2 型糖尿病的药物的批准前和批准后环境中的作用。在考虑了咨询小组的建议和其他数据后,FDA 发布了一份指导文件,要求提供证据表明,用于治疗 2 型糖尿病的新治疗方法不会导致不可接受的心血管风险增加。本文首先总结了导致发布该指南的事件。随后的部分讨论了指南本身以及实施新的心血管建议的一般考虑因素。用于治疗 2 型糖尿病的药物的新开发方法将导致在更能代表那些将使用这些疗法的患者中进行评估,如果获得批准,这将有助于医疗保健提供者在选择治疗 2 型糖尿病的不断增长的治疗武器库中的药物时做出明智的决策。

相似文献

1
Impact of cardiovascular outcomes on the development and approval of medications for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.心血管结局对治疗糖尿病药物的研发和批准的影响。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2010 Mar;11(1):21-30. doi: 10.1007/s11154-010-9130-8.
2
Impact of Regulatory Guidance on Evaluating Cardiovascular Risk of New Glucose-Lowering Therapies to Treat Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.评估新型降糖疗法治疗 2 型糖尿病心血管风险的监管指导意见的影响:经验教训与未来方向。
Circulation. 2020 Mar 10;141(10):843-862. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041022. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
3
Evaluating cardiovascular safety of novel therapeutic agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.评估新型治疗 2 型糖尿病药物的心血管安全性。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 Nov;16(11):541. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0541-0.
4
A comprehensive review of the FDA-approved labels of diabetes drugs: Indications, safety, and emerging cardiovascular safety data.对 FDA 批准的糖尿病药物标签的全面回顾:适应证、安全性和新兴的心血管安全性数据。
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Dec;31(12):1719-1727. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
5
FDA guidance on antihyperglyacemic therapies for type 2 diabetes: One decade later.美国食品药品监督管理局关于 2 型糖尿病抗高血糖治疗的指南:十年后。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 May;21(5):1073-1078. doi: 10.1111/dom.13645. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
6
Reflections on using non-inferiority randomised placebo controlled trials in assessing cardiovascular safety of new agents for treatment of type 2 diabetes.关于使用非劣效性随机安慰剂对照试验评估2型糖尿病治疗新药心血管安全性的思考
Evid Based Med. 2017 Apr;22(2):54-56. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110685. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
7
Assessing the cardiovascular safety of diabetes therapies.评估糖尿病治疗的心血管安全性。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 11;359(11):1092-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0805758.
8
Is Hemoglobin A1c the Right Outcome for Studies of Diabetes?糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)是糖尿病研究的恰当结局指标吗?
JAMA. 2017 Mar 14;317(10):1017-1018. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0029.
9
Cardiovascular Safety Trials for All New Diabetes Mellitus Drugs?所有新型糖尿病药物都要进行心血管安全性试验吗?
Circulation. 2019 Apr 2;139(14):1741-1743. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038771.
10
Beyond HbA1c.超越糖化血红蛋白。
J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;9(12):1052-1053. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12590. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors differ by first manifestation of cardiovascular disease in type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病患者心血管疾病首发表现的危险因素不同。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 May;163:108141. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108141. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
2
Hemoglobin A is associated with severity of coronary artery stenosis but not with long term clinical outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty.血红蛋白 A 与冠状动脉狭窄严重程度相关,但与接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病和非糖尿病急性心肌梗死患者的长期临床结局无关。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Aug 8;16(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0578-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2010》
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.
2
Rationale, design, and governance of Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety versus Ibuprofen Or Naproxen (PRECISION), a cardiovascular end point trial of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents in patients with arthritis.塞来昔布综合安全性与布洛芬或萘普生前瞻性随机评估(PRECISION)的原理、设计与管理,一项针对关节炎患者的非甾体抗炎药心血管终点试验。
Am Heart J. 2009 Apr;157(4):606-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.12.014. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
3
Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes.
Update on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Light of Recent Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association.
基于最新证据的2型糖尿病成年患者心血管疾病预防最新进展:美国心脏协会和美国糖尿病协会的科学声明
Diabetes Care. 2015 Sep;38(9):1777-803. doi: 10.2337/dci15-0012. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
4
Update on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Light of Recent Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association.基于最新证据的2型糖尿病成年患者心血管疾病预防最新进展:美国心脏协会和美国糖尿病协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2015 Aug 25;132(8):691-718. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000230. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
5
The use of surrogate endpoints in regulating medicines for cardio-renal disease: opinions of stakeholders.在心血管肾脏疾病药物监管中使用替代终点:利益相关者的观点。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e108722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108722. eCollection 2014.
6
FoxOs integrate pleiotropic actions of insulin in vascular endothelium to protect mice from atherosclerosis.FoxOs 整合胰岛素在血管内皮中的多效作用,以保护小鼠免受动脉粥样硬化的侵害。
Cell Metab. 2012 Mar 7;15(3):372-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.01.018.
2型糖尿病退伍军人的血糖控制与血管并发症
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):129-39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808431. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
4
Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.强化降糖对2型糖尿病的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2545-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
5
Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者强化血糖控制与血管转归
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
6
Trends in A1C concentrations among U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes from 1999 to 2004.1999年至2004年美国成年糖尿病确诊患者的糖化血红蛋白(A1C)浓度变化趋势。
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jan;31(1):102-4. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0565. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
7
Rosiglitazone and the FDA.罗格列酮与美国食品药品监督管理局
N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 25;357(17):1775-6; author reply 1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc076347. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
8
The rosiglitazone story--lessons from an FDA Advisory Committee meeting.罗格列酮事件——美国食品药品监督管理局咨询委员会会议的教训
N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 30;357(9):844-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078167. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
9
Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy.罗格列酮、二甲双胍或格列本脲单药治疗的血糖耐久性。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 7;355(23):2427-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066224. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
10
Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: A consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.2型糖尿病高血糖管理:治疗起始与调整的共识算法:美国糖尿病协会和欧洲糖尿病研究协会的共识声明
Diabetes Care. 2006 Aug;29(8):1963-72. doi: 10.2337/dc06-9912.