• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最优假设检验:从半贝叶斯因子到全贝叶斯因子

Optimal Hypothesis Testing: From Semi to Fully Bayes Factors.

作者信息

Vexler Albert, Wu Chengqing, Yu Kai Fun

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, The New York State University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA

出版信息

Metrika. 2010 Mar 1;71(2):125-138. doi: 10.1007/s00184-008-0205-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00184-008-0205-4
PMID:20198107
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2826851/
Abstract

We propose and examine statistical test-strategies that are somewhat between the maximum likelihood ratio and Bayes factor methods that are well addressed in the literature. The paper shows an optimality of the proposed tests of hypothesis. We demonstrate that our approach can be easily applied to practical studies, because execution of the tests does not require deriving of asymptotical analytical solutions regarding the type I error. However, when the proposed method is utilized, the classical significance level of tests can be controlled.

摘要

我们提出并检验了一些统计检验策略,这些策略介于文献中已有详细论述的最大似然比方法和贝叶斯因子方法之间。本文展示了所提出的假设检验的最优性。我们证明了我们的方法可以很容易地应用于实际研究,因为执行这些检验不需要推导关于第一类错误的渐近解析解。然而,当使用所提出的方法时,可以控制检验的经典显著性水平。

相似文献

1
Optimal Hypothesis Testing: From Semi to Fully Bayes Factors.最优假设检验:从半贝叶斯因子到全贝叶斯因子
Metrika. 2010 Mar 1;71(2):125-138. doi: 10.1007/s00184-008-0205-4.
2
Bayesian Empirical Likelihood Methods for Quantile Comparisons.用于分位数比较的贝叶斯经验似然方法。
J Korean Stat Soc. 2017 Dec;46(4):518-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jkss.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
3
Nonparametric Bayes Factors Based On Empirical Likelihood Ratios.基于经验似然比的非参数贝叶斯因子
J Stat Plan Inference. 2013 Mar 1;143(3):611-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
4
On Bayes factors for hypothesis tests.关于假设检验的贝叶斯因子。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1070-1094. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02612-2. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
5
Bayesian Hodges-Lehmann tests for statistical equivalence in the two-sample setting: Power analysis, type I error rates and equivalence boundary selection in biomedical research.贝叶斯霍奇斯-莱曼检验在两样本设置中的统计等效性:生物医学研究中的功效分析、Ⅰ类错误率和等效边界选择。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01341-7.
6
Elements of significance testing with equivalence problems.
Methods Inf Med. 1991 Aug;30(3):194-8.
7
A Minimax Optimal Ridge-Type Set Test for Global Hypothesis with Applications in Whole Genome Sequencing Association Studies.用于全局假设的极小极大最优岭型集检验及其在全基因组测序关联研究中的应用
J Am Stat Assoc. 2022;117(538):897-908. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1831926. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
8
A default Bayes factor for testing null hypotheses about the fixed effects of linear two-level models.用于检验线性二级模型固定效应零假设的默认贝叶斯因子。
Psychol Methods. 2025 Jun;30(3):579-598. doi: 10.1037/met0000573. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
9
Efficiency in sequential testing: Comparing the sequential probability ratio test and the sequential Bayes factor test.序贯检验的效率:比较序贯似然比检验和序贯贝叶斯因子检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Dec;54(6):3100-3117. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01754-8. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
10
Waldian t tests: Sequential Bayesian t tests with controlled error probabilities.瓦尔德检验:具有受控误差概率的序贯贝叶斯 t 检验。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Feb;29(1):99-116. doi: 10.1037/met0000492. Epub 2022 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A Characterization of Most(More) Powerful Test Statistics with Simple Nonparametric Applications.具有简单非参数应用的多数(更多)强大检验统计量的特征描述
Am Stat. 2024;78(1):36-46. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2023.2192746. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
2
Bayesian Empirical Likelihood Methods for Quantile Comparisons.用于分位数比较的贝叶斯经验似然方法。
J Korean Stat Soc. 2017 Dec;46(4):518-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jkss.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
3
Density-based empirical likelihood procedures for testing symmetry of data distributions and K-sample comparisons.用于检验数据分布对称性和K样本比较的基于密度的经验似然方法。
Stata J. 2014;14(2):304-328.
4
A Simple Density-Based Empirical Likelihood Ratio Test for Independence.一种基于密度的简单独立性经验似然比检验。
Am Stat. 2014;48(3):158-169. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2014.901922.
5
An Exact Density-Based Empirical Likelihood Ratio Test for Paired Data.一种用于配对数据的基于精确密度的经验似然比检验。
J Stat Plan Inference. 2013 Feb 1;143(2):334-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2012.07.018. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
6
Nonparametric Bayes Factors Based On Empirical Likelihood Ratios.基于经验似然比的非参数贝叶斯因子
J Stat Plan Inference. 2013 Mar 1;143(3):611-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
7
Two-sample density-based empirical likelihood ratio tests based on paired data, with application to a treatment study of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and severe mood dysregulation.基于配对数据的两样本密度基经验似然比检验及其在注意缺陷/多动障碍和严重情绪失调治疗研究中的应用。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 30;31(17):1821-37. doi: 10.1002/sim.4467. Epub 2012 Jun 20.