• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于假设检验的贝叶斯因子。

On Bayes factors for hypothesis tests.

作者信息

Klauer Karl Christoph, Meyer-Grant Constantin G, Kellen David

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, 79085, Freiburg, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1070-1094. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02612-2. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-024-02612-2
PMID:39586998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12092502/
Abstract

We develop alternative families of Bayes factors for use in hypothesis tests as alternatives to the popular default Bayes factors. The alternative Bayes factors are derived for the statistical analyses most commonly used in psychological research - one-sample and two-sample t tests, regression, and ANOVA analyses. They possess the same desirable theoretical and practical properties as the default Bayes factors and satisfy additional theoretical desiderata while mitigating against two features of the default priors that we consider implausible. They can be conveniently computed via an R package that we provide. Furthermore, hypothesis tests based on Bayes factors and those based on significance tests are juxtaposed. This discussion leads to the insight that default Bayes factors as well as the alternative Bayes factors are equivalent to test-statistic-based Bayes factors as proposed by Johnson. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 67, 689-701. (2005). We highlight test-statistic-based Bayes factors as a general approach to Bayes-factor computation that is applicable to many hypothesis-testing problems for which an effect-size measure has been proposed and for which test power can be computed.

摘要

我们开发了替代的贝叶斯因子族,用于假设检验,作为流行的默认贝叶斯因子的替代方案。这些替代贝叶斯因子是为心理学研究中最常用的统计分析而推导出来的——单样本和两样本t检验、回归分析和方差分析。它们具有与默认贝叶斯因子相同的理想理论和实践特性,满足额外的理论要求,同时减轻了我们认为不合理的默认先验的两个特征。它们可以通过我们提供的R包方便地计算出来。此外,还将基于贝叶斯因子的假设检验与基于显著性检验的假设检验并列。这一讨论得出的见解是,默认贝叶斯因子以及替代贝叶斯因子等同于约翰逊提出的基于检验统计量的贝叶斯因子。《皇家统计学会会刊B辑:统计方法》,67卷,689 - 701页。(2005年)。我们强调基于检验统计量的贝叶斯因子是一种通用的贝叶斯因子计算方法,适用于许多已经提出效应量度量且可以计算检验功效的假设检验问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/bd2ba8121042/13423_2024_2612_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/94e5142a8ebc/13423_2024_2612_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/1828dcf18153/13423_2024_2612_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/6c004982c051/13423_2024_2612_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/a1603c9b9ec5/13423_2024_2612_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/79287e49da68/13423_2024_2612_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/d456dbe68ee0/13423_2024_2612_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/ec5eedcf00bb/13423_2024_2612_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/bcd9439800b4/13423_2024_2612_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/0d84f3a1f98a/13423_2024_2612_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/da921a7498f6/13423_2024_2612_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/bd2ba8121042/13423_2024_2612_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/94e5142a8ebc/13423_2024_2612_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/1828dcf18153/13423_2024_2612_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/6c004982c051/13423_2024_2612_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/a1603c9b9ec5/13423_2024_2612_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/79287e49da68/13423_2024_2612_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/d456dbe68ee0/13423_2024_2612_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/ec5eedcf00bb/13423_2024_2612_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/bcd9439800b4/13423_2024_2612_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/0d84f3a1f98a/13423_2024_2612_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/da921a7498f6/13423_2024_2612_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d83b/12092502/bd2ba8121042/13423_2024_2612_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
On Bayes factors for hypothesis tests.关于假设检验的贝叶斯因子。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Jun;32(3):1070-1094. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02612-2. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Fabricating mice and dementia: opening up relations in multi-species research制造小鼠与痴呆症:开启多物种研究中的关联
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years.一项关于心理学中贝叶斯文章的系统评价:过去 25 年。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Jun;22(2):217-239. doi: 10.1037/met0000100.
6
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
7
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
9
Digital interventions in mental health: evidence syntheses and economic modelling.数字干预在精神健康中的应用:证据综合和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jan;26(1):1-182. doi: 10.3310/RCTI6942.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Uncertainty limits the use of power analysis.不确定性限制了功效分析的使用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Apr;153(4):1139-1151. doi: 10.1037/xge0001273.
2
"This behavior strikes us as ideal": assessment and anticipations of Huisman (2022).“这种行为让我们觉得很理想”:对 Huisman(2022)的评估和预期。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):242-248. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02299-x. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
3
Better Accuracy for Better Science . . . Through Random Conclusions.为了更准确的科学结果,通过随意下结论来提高准确性。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):223-243. doi: 10.1177/17456916231182097. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
4
Are P-values and Bayes factors valid measures of evidential strength?P 值和贝叶斯因子是证据强度的有效衡量标准吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):932-941. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02205-x. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
5
Efficient alternatives for Bayesian hypothesis tests in psychology.心理学中贝叶斯假设检验的有效替代方法。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Apr;29(2):243-261. doi: 10.1037/met0000482. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
6
A review of applications of the Bayes factor in psychological research.贝叶斯因子在心理学研究中的应用综述。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Jun;28(3):558-579. doi: 10.1037/met0000454. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
Workflow techniques for the robust use of bayes factors.贝叶斯因子稳健应用的工作流技术。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Dec;28(6):1404-1426. doi: 10.1037/met0000472. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
8
Advantages masquerading as "issues" in Bayesian hypothesis testing: A commentary on Tendeiro and Kiers (2019).贝叶斯假设检验中“问题”的伪装优势:对 Tendeiro 和 Kiers(2019)的评论。
Psychol Methods. 2022 Jun;27(3):451-465. doi: 10.1037/met0000415. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
9
What is a Bayes factor?什么是贝叶斯因子?
Psychol Methods. 2023 Jun;28(3):705-718. doi: 10.1037/met0000421. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
10
Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines.贝叶斯分析报告指南。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1282-1291. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01177-7. Epub 2021 Aug 16.