Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Apr-Jun;14(2):209-21. doi: 10.3109/10903120903564514.
Few studies have examined employee turnover and associated costs in emergency medical services (EMS).
To quantify the mean annual rate of turnover, total median cost of turnover, and median cost per termination in a diverse sample of EMS agencies.
A convenience sample of 40 EMS agencies was followed over a six-month period. Internet, telephone, and on-site data-collection methods were used to document terminations, new hires, open positions, and costs associated with turnover. The cost associated with turnover was calculated based on a modified version of the Nursing Turnover Cost Calculation Methodology (NTCCM). The NTCCM identified direct and indirect costs through a series of questions that agency administrators answered monthly during the study period. A previously tested measure of turnover to calculate the mean annual rate of turnover was used. All calculations were weighted by the size of the EMS agency roster. The mean annual rate of turnover, total median cost of turnover, and median cost per termination were determined for three categories of agency staff mix: all-paid staff, mix of paid and volunteer (mixed) staff, and all-volunteer staff.
The overall weighted mean annual rate of turnover was 10.7%. This rate varied slightly across agency staffing mix (all-paid = 10.2%, mixed = 12.3%, all-volunteer = 12.4%). Among agencies that experienced turnover (n = 25), the weighted median cost of turnover was $71,613.75, which varied across agency staffing mix (all-paid = $86,452.05, mixed = $9,766.65, and all-volunteer = $0). The weighted median cost per termination was $6,871.51 and varied across agency staffing mix (all-paid = $7,161.38, mixed = $1,409.64, and all-volunteer = $0).
Annual rates of turnover and costs associated with turnover vary widely across types of EMS agencies. The study's mean annual rate of turnover was lower than expected based on information appearing in the news media and EMS trade magazines. Findings provide estimates of two key workforce measures--turnover rates and costs--where previously none have existed. Local EMS directors and policymakers at all levels of government may find the results and study methodology useful toward designing and evaluating programs targeting the EMS workforce.
很少有研究调查急诊医疗服务(EMS)中的员工离职率和相关成本。
在多样化的 EMS 机构样本中,量化离职率的平均年率、离职总成本以及每次离职的平均成本。
对 40 个 EMS 机构进行了便利抽样,并在六个月的时间内进行了随访。使用互联网、电话和现场数据收集方法记录离职、新招聘、空缺职位以及与离职相关的成本。根据护理离职成本计算方法学(NTCCM)的修订版计算与离职相关的成本。NTCCM 通过机构管理员在研究期间每月回答的一系列问题来确定直接和间接成本。使用经过测试的离职率衡量标准来计算平均年离职率。所有计算均按 EMS 机构人员名单的规模加权。确定了三个类别的机构员工组合的平均年离职率、离职总成本和每次离职的平均成本:全薪员工、全薪和志愿者混合员工(混合)和全志愿者员工。
总的加权平均年离职率为 10.7%。这一比率在机构人员配备组合上略有差异(全薪=10.2%,混合=12.3%,全志愿者=12.4%)。在经历离职的机构中(n=25),加权离职总成本为 71613.75 美元,这在机构人员配备组合上有所不同(全薪=86452.05 美元,混合=9766.65 美元,全志愿者=0 美元)。加权每次离职的平均成本为 6871.51 美元,在机构人员配备组合上有所不同(全薪=7161.38 美元,混合=1409.64 美元,全志愿者=0 美元)。
各类型 EMS 机构的离职率和与离职相关的成本差异很大。该研究的平均年离职率低于新闻媒体和 EMS 行业杂志上显示的信息所预期的水平。研究结果提供了两个关键劳动力指标的估计——离职率和成本,而此前这些指标并不存在。地方 EMS 主管和各级政府的政策制定者可能会发现研究结果和研究方法对于设计和评估针对 EMS 劳动力的计划有用。