Suppr超能文献

美国志愿和付费 EMS 专业人员的比较。

Comparison of Volunteer and Paid EMS Professionals in the United States.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021 Mar-Apr;25(2):205-212. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1752867. Epub 2020 May 1.

Abstract

Emergency medical response is provided by volunteer emergency medical services (EMS) professionals in many parts of the United States. However, little is known about those who serve as volunteer EMS professionals, especially as their main EMS job. Our objective was to compare the characteristics of nationally-certified volunteer versus paid EMS professionals in the U.S. We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of EMS professionals who recertified their National EMS Certification between October 1, 2017-March 31, 2018 or October 1, 2018-March 31, 2019. Data were obtained from 2 cycles of the biennial National EMS Certification recertification application. We included currently working, nonmilitary EMS professionals aged 18-85 years at the emergency medical technician (EMT) or higher certification level. Volunteer was defined as receiving nominal or no compensation for the provision of EMS services at an agency as the main EMS job. Comparisons were made, accounting for the large sample size, to determine notable differences between volunteer and paid EMS professionals. Of the 154,229 EMS professionals that met inclusion criteria (response rate = 86%), 13% volunteered at their main EMS job. More volunteer than paid EMS professionals were female (38% vs. 22%). There was also a significant difference in certification level between volunteer and paid (EMT: 82% vs. 46%). Three-quarters (74%) of volunteer EMS professionals reported working in rural communities compared to 30% of paid. The states with the largest proportion of volunteers to any currently working EMS professionals who recertified were Vermont (47%) and North Dakota (45%). Approximately 13% of the EMS workforce held a primary job in EMS as a volunteer, and these volunteer EMS professionals differed from their paid counterparts - e.g., volunteers were more likely to be women, have EMT certification, and work in rural areas. We encourage further research to understand motivations for volunteering in EMS.

摘要

在美国的许多地区,紧急医疗响应由志愿紧急医疗服务(EMS)专业人员提供。然而,对于这些作为志愿 EMS 专业人员服务的人员,尤其是作为他们的主要 EMS 工作的人员,了解甚少。我们的目的是比较美国具有国家认证的志愿与付费 EMS 专业人员的特征。我们对 2017 年 10 月 1 日至 2018 年 3 月 31 日或 2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日期间重新认证其国家 EMS 认证的 EMS 专业人员进行了横断面评估。数据来自两次两年一次的国家 EMS 认证再认证申请中获得。我们纳入了当前在紧急医疗技术员(EMT)或更高认证级别工作的,年龄在 18-85 岁之间的非军事 EMS 专业人员。志愿被定义为在机构中作为主要 EMS 工作获得名义或无报酬的 EMS 服务。为了确定志愿与付费 EMS 专业人员之间的显著差异,我们进行了比较,考虑到了大样本量。在符合纳入标准的 154229 名 EMS 专业人员中(响应率=86%),有 13%的人在主要 EMS 工作中是志愿者。与付费 EMS 专业人员相比,志愿 EMS 专业人员中的女性比例更高(38%比 22%)。志愿与付费之间的认证水平也存在显著差异(EMT:82%比 46%)。四分之三(74%)的志愿 EMS 专业人员报告在农村社区工作,而付费人员的这一比例为 30%。在任何重新认证的在职 EMS 专业人员中,志愿人员比例最大的州是佛蒙特州(47%)和北达科他州(45%)。约有 13%的 EMS 劳动力作为志愿人员从事 EMS 的主要工作,并且这些志愿 EMS 专业人员与付费人员有所不同,例如,志愿者更有可能是女性,具有 EMT 认证,并且在农村地区工作。我们鼓励进一步研究以了解在 EMS 中从事志愿服务的动机。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验