Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, The Sixth Affiliated People's Hospital, Medical School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
J Endovasc Ther. 2010 Feb;17(1):55-65. doi: 10.1583/09-2688.1.
To compare the use of the Willis stent-graft versus coil embolization for complicated aneurysms in the cisternal segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA).
Thirty-four patients (19 women; mean age 46.7+/-16.8 years, range 3-79) with 36 complicated aneurysms were treated either by Willis covered stents (n = 19) or by coil embolization (n = 17). Follow-up angiography was performed to investigate aneurysm recurrence, endoleak, and parent artery stenosis. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to compare the freedom from recurrence and parent artery stenosis rates in both groups. Clinical follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed and categorized as fully recovered, improved, unchanged, or worsened.
In the covered stent group, total exclusion was immediately achieved in 13 aneurysms; there were 5 minor endoleaks and 1 delivery failure. In the patients treated with coil embolization, total/near-total occlusion was achieved in 7 aneurysms, subtotal in 8, and partial in 2. Acute thrombosis occurred in 1 patient in each group, while 1 patient experienced recurrent hemorrhage after embolotherapy. Follow-up angiography (mean 14.3+/-9.4, range 3-31) revealed that 16 aneurysms were completely isolated in the stent-graft group, with only 2 mild in-stent stenoses. Eighteen months after the procedure, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed recurrence-free rates of 93.3% and 50% for the stent-graft versus coil groups, respectively; freedom from parent artery stenosis was 87.5% and 100%. Symptoms were fully eliminated in 9 patients in each group; they were improved in 3 and 5, unchanged in 2 and 2, and worsened in 1 and 0, respectively, at the end of the follow-up period.
Willis stent-graft application is an alternative to treat complicated aneurysms in the cisternal segment of the ICA. In the case of a tortuous parent artery or potential side branch coverage, however, it is still not a first choice therapy.
比较 Willis 覆膜支架与弹簧圈栓塞治疗颈内动脉(ICA)海绵窦段复杂动脉瘤的效果。
34 例(19 例女性;平均年龄 46.7+/-16.8 岁,范围 3-79 岁)36 个复杂动脉瘤患者分别接受 Willis 覆膜支架治疗(n = 19)或弹簧圈栓塞治疗(n = 17)。进行随访血管造影以研究动脉瘤复发、内漏和载瘤动脉狭窄。通过 Kaplan-Meier 曲线比较两组的无复发和无载瘤动脉狭窄率。回顾性分析临床随访资料,并分为完全恢复、改善、不变和恶化。
覆膜支架组 13 个动脉瘤即刻完全闭塞,5 个小内漏,1 个输送失败。弹簧圈栓塞组 7 个动脉瘤完全/近完全闭塞,8 个部分闭塞,2 个部分闭塞。每组各有 1 例发生急性血栓形成,1 例栓塞治疗后再出血。平均随访 14.3+/-9.4 个月(范围 3-31),覆膜支架组 16 个动脉瘤完全隔离,仅 2 例支架内轻度狭窄。18 个月后,Kaplan-Meier 分析显示支架组的无复发率为 93.3%,弹簧圈组为 50%;无载瘤动脉狭窄率分别为 87.5%和 100%。两组各有 9 例症状完全消除,各有 3 例和 5 例症状改善,各有 2 例和 2 例症状不变,各有 1 例和 0 例症状恶化。
Willis 覆膜支架应用是治疗颈内动脉海绵窦段复杂动脉瘤的一种替代方法。然而,对于迂曲的载瘤动脉或潜在的侧支覆盖,它仍然不是首选治疗方法。