University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. katina.d'
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1423-40. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.037. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
Early childhood development interventions (ECDIs) have the potential to bring about wide ranging human capital benefits for children through to adulthood. Less is known, however, about the potential for such interventions to improve population health. The aim of this study was to examine the evidence for child health effects of centre-based preschool intervention programs for healthy 4 year olds, beyond the preschool years. Medline, Embase, ERIC, Psych Info, Sociological Abstracts, the Cochrane Library, C2-SPECTR and the Head Start database were searched using terms relating to preschool and health from 1980 to July 2008, limited to English language publications. Reference lists and the journal Child Development were hand searched for eligible articles missed by the electronic search. There were 37 eligible studies identified. The reviewed studies examined a range of interventions from centre-based preschool alone, to interventions also including parenting programs and/or health services. The study populations were mostly sampled from populations at risk of school failure (76%). Only eight of the 37 studies had a strong methodological rating, 15 were evaluated as at moderate potential risk of bias and 14 as at high potential risk of bias. The review found generally null effects of preschool interventions across a range of health outcomes, however there was some evidence for obesity reduction, greater social competence, improved mental health and crime prevention. We conclude that the great potential for early childhood interventions to improve population health across a range of health outcomes, as anticipated by policy makers worldwide, currently rests on a rather flimsy evidence base. Given the potential and the increasingly large public investment in these interventions, it is imperative that population health researchers, practitioners and policy makers worldwide collaborate to advance this research agenda.
早期儿童发展干预(ECDIs)有可能通过儿童期到成年期为儿童带来广泛的人力资本收益。然而,对于这些干预措施改善人口健康的潜力了解较少。本研究旨在考察针对健康 4 岁儿童的以中心为基础的学前干预计划对儿童健康的影响,超越学前阶段。使用与学前和健康相关的术语,从 1980 年到 2008 年 7 月,对 Medline、Embase、ERIC、Psych Info、Sociological Abstracts、Cochrane 图书馆、C2-SPECTR 和 Head Start 数据库进行了搜索,仅限于英语出版物。参考列表和期刊《儿童发展》也被手工搜索,以查找电子搜索遗漏的合格文章。确定了 37 项符合条件的研究。审查的研究检查了一系列干预措施,从以中心为基础的学前教育单独进行,到干预措施还包括育儿计划和/或保健服务。研究人群主要来自有辍学风险的人群(76%)。在 37 项研究中,只有 8 项具有很强的方法学评分,15 项被评估为中度偏倚风险,14 项为高偏倚风险。审查发现,学前干预对一系列健康结果的总体影响通常为零,尽管有一些证据表明肥胖减少、社会能力提高、心理健康改善和预防犯罪。我们的结论是,全世界政策制定者普遍预期,早期儿童干预有可能改善一系列健康结果的人口健康,但目前这一预期的证据基础相当薄弱。鉴于这些干预措施的潜力和越来越大的公共投资,全世界的人口健康研究人员、从业者和政策制定者必须合作,推进这一研究议程。