Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, 1 Stewart Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Public Health Policy. 2010 Apr;31(1):74-87. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2009.48.
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) marks a unique point in the history of global health governance. This convention produced the first legally binding treaty under the auspices of the World Health Organization. Another first was the extent to which non-governmental organizations (NGOs) participated in the negotiation process. This article explores the relationship between one group of NGOs and their respective government during the negotiation of the FCTC. Documentary analyses and 18 individual in-depth interviews were conducted with both government and NGO representatives. In contrast to the polar perspectives of idealism (NGOs as unique and autonomous) and realism (NGOs as funded arms of the government), our findings suggest that neither opposition nor conformity on the part of the NGOs characterize the relationship between the NGOs and government. While specific to the case under study (the FCTC), our findings nonetheless indicate the need for a nuanced view of the relationship between governments and NGOs, at least during the process of multilateral health policy negotiations.
《烟草控制框架公约》标志着全球卫生治理史上的一个独特时刻。该公约是在世卫组织主持下达成的第一项具有法律约束力的条约。另一个首次是指非政府组织(NGO)参与谈判进程的程度。本文探讨了一组非政府组织及其各自政府在《烟草控制框架公约》谈判过程中的关系。对政府和非政府组织代表进行了文件分析和 18 次个人深入访谈。与理想主义(非政府组织是独特和自主的)和现实主义(非政府组织是政府资助的工具)的两极观点相反,我们的研究结果表明,非政府组织既不反对也不认同它们与政府之间的关系。虽然具体到研究案例(《烟草控制框架公约》),但我们的研究结果表明,至少在多边卫生政策谈判过程中,需要对政府和非政府组织之间的关系有一个细致入微的看法。