Suppr超能文献

食物过敏的诊断性检测。

Diagnostic tests for food allergy.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, National University Hospital, and Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074.

出版信息

Singapore Med J. 2010 Jan;51(1):4-9.

Abstract

The diagnosis of food allergy is still based primarily on a detailed medical history and comprehensive physical examination. Clinical or laboratory tests only serve as an add-on tool to confirm the diagnosis. The standard techniques include skin prick testing and in-vitro testing for specific IgE-antibodies, and oral food challenges. Properly done, oral food challenges continue to be the gold standard in the diagnostic workup. Recently, unconventional diagnostic methods are increasingly used. These include food specific IgG, antigen leucocyte antibody and sublingual/intradermal provocation tests, as well as cytotoxic food and applied kinesiology and electrodermal testings. These lack scientific rationale, standardisation and reproducibility. There have been no well-designed studies to support these tests, and in fact, several authors have disproved their utility. These tests, therefore, should not be advocated in the evaluation of patients with suspected food allergy because the results do not correlate with clinical allergy and may lead to misleading advice and treatment.

摘要

食物过敏的诊断仍然主要基于详细的病史和全面的体格检查。临床或实验室检查只是作为确认诊断的附加工具。标准技术包括皮肤点刺试验和特异性 IgE 抗体的体外检测,以及口服食物挑战。如果操作得当,口服食物挑战仍然是诊断性检查的金标准。最近,非常规的诊断方法越来越多地被使用。这些方法包括食物特异性 IgG、抗原白细胞抗体和舌下/皮内激发试验,以及细胞毒性食物和应用运动学和皮肤电测试。这些方法缺乏科学依据、标准化和可重复性。没有经过精心设计的研究来支持这些测试,事实上,有几位作者已经证明了它们的无用性。因此,在评估疑似食物过敏的患者时,不应提倡这些测试,因为这些测试的结果与临床过敏无关,可能会导致误导性的建议和治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验