• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合理评估非激素性热潮治疗长期疗效的最小试验持续时间。

Minimum trial duration to reasonably assess long-term efficacy of nonhormonal hot flash therapies.

机构信息

University at Buffalo , Buffalo, New York 14214, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Apr;19(4):699-702. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1610.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.2009.1610
PMID:20201698
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because hot flashes usually persist for years after menopause, a clinically meaningful hot flash therapy needs to have long-term efficacy; however, it is unclear for how long a therapy needs to be compared with a placebo before long-term efficacy can be reasonably deduced. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires a 12-week treatment period for industry-initiated hot flash trials, whereas most academic-initiated trials have ranged from 4 to 12 weeks. We have focused on reviewing nonhormonal hot flash trials to identify inadequate trial durations as a guide toward deducing adequate trial duration to reasonably assess for long-term efficacy.

METHODS

An electronic database search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and PsycINFO was performed from 1966 to May 2009 to identify target studies showing a nonhormonal hot flash therapy to be effective at early time points only to become ineffective at later time points (i.e., showing short-term but not long-term efficacy) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The longest early time point of efficacy from the target studies plus 1 additional week would be considered the minimum treatment duration necessary to assess for long-term efficacy.

RESULTS

Of 2518 citations, 54 RCTs met our inclusion criteria, from which 3 target studies were identified. These 3 target studies evaluated Bellergal Retard (Sandoz, East Hanover, NJ), soy, and venlafaxine and showed times of 2, 6, and 7 weeks, respectively, when the nonhormonal compound last demonstrated efficacy before subsequently losing efficacy in a single RCT.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis supports a hot flash RCT duration of at least 8 weeks to reasonably assess a nonhormonal compound's long-term efficacy.

摘要

背景

由于热潮通常在绝经后持续多年,因此一种有临床意义的热潮治疗需要具有长期疗效;但是,尚不清楚与安慰剂相比,需要多长时间的治疗才能合理推断长期疗效。食品和药物管理局(FDA)要求行业发起的热潮试验的治疗期为 12 周,而大多数学术发起的试验则为 4 至 12 周。我们一直专注于审查非激素热潮试验,以确定试验持续时间不足,作为推断合理评估长期疗效所需的足够试验持续时间的指南。

方法

从 1966 年至 2009 年 5 月,我们通过 MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 PsycINFO 进行了电子数据库搜索,以确定目标研究,这些研究表明,一种非激素热潮治疗方法在早期仅有效,但在随后的时间点无效(即仅显示短期而不是长期疗效)随机对照试验(RCT)。从目标研究中最早的有效时间点再加 1 周,将被视为评估长期疗效所需的最短治疗持续时间。

结果

在 2518 条引文中,有 54 项 RCT 符合我们的纳入标准,其中有 3 项是目标研究。这 3 项目标研究评估了 Bellergal Retard(Sandoz,新泽西州东 Hanover)、大豆和文拉法辛,分别显示出 2、6 和 7 周的时间,在这些时间之后,非激素化合物在单次 RCT 中随后失去疗效之前,最后一次显示出疗效。

结论

这项分析支持至少进行 8 周的热潮 RCT,以合理评估非激素化合物的长期疗效。

相似文献

1
Minimum trial duration to reasonably assess long-term efficacy of nonhormonal hot flash therapies.合理评估非激素性热潮治疗长期疗效的最小试验持续时间。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Apr;19(4):699-702. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1610.
2
Centrally active nonhormonal hot flash therapies.中枢活性非激素潮热疗法。
Am J Med. 2005 Dec 19;118 Suppl 12B:118-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.045.
3
Treatment of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: position statement of The North American Menopause Society.更年期相关血管舒缩症状的治疗:北美更年期协会立场声明
Menopause. 2004 Jan-Feb;11(1):11-33. doi: 10.1097/01.GME.0000108177.85442.71.
4
Effective and clinically meaningful non-hormonal hot flash therapies.有效且具有临床意义的非激素潮热治疗方法。
Maturitas. 2012 May;72(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.01.023. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
5
Use of gabapentin for the management of natural or surgical menopausal hot flashes.加巴喷丁用于治疗自然或手术绝经后热潮红。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Mar;45(3):388-94. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P366. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
6
Newer antidepressants and gabapentin for hot flashes: a discussion of trial duration.新型抗抑郁药和加巴喷丁治疗潮热:关于试验持续时间的讨论
Menopause. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):883-7. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31819c46c7.
7
Nonhormonal alternatives for the treatment of hot flashes.治疗潮热的非激素替代方法。
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Jan;24(1):79-93. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.1.79.34812.
8
Use of gabapentin in patients experiencing hot flashes.加巴喷丁在潮热患者中的应用。
Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Jan;29(1):74-81. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.1.74.
9
Effects of acupuncture on menopause-related symptoms and quality of life in women in natural menopause: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.针刺对自然绝经女性更年期相关症状及生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Menopause. 2015 Feb;22(2):234-44. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000260.
10
Nonhormonal Hot Flash Management for Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.乳腺癌幸存者的非激素潮热管理:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Apr 28;2020:4243175. doi: 10.1155/2020/4243175. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of estrogen and venlafaxine on menopause-related quality of life in healthy postmenopausal women with hot flashes: a placebo-controlled randomized trial.雌激素和文拉法辛对有潮热症状的健康绝经后妇女绝经相关生活质量的影响:一项安慰剂对照随机试验
Menopause. 2015 Jun;22(6):607-15. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000364.
2
Efficacy of yoga for vasomotor symptoms: a randomized controlled trial.瑜伽对血管舒缩症状的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Menopause. 2014 Apr;21(4):339-46. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31829e4baa.
3
Impact of dose, frequency of administration, and equol production on efficacy of isoflavones for menopausal hot flashes: a pilot randomized trial.
剂量、给药频率和雌马酚生成对大豆异黄酮治疗绝经潮热疗效的影响:一项初步随机试验。
Menopause. 2013 Sep;20(9):936-45. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e3182829413.
4
Efficacy of escitalopram for hot flashes in healthy menopausal women: a randomized controlled trial.依西酞普兰治疗健康绝经后妇女热潮红的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2011 Jan 19;305(3):267-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.2016.