Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute & Division of Social Statistics, University of Southampton, UK.
J Biosoc Sci. 2010 Jul;42(4):563-72. doi: 10.1017/S0021932010000064. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
Consistency in reporting contraceptive use between spouses is little understood, especially in developing settings. This research challenges the accuracy of measuring contraceptive prevalence rate, which is traditionally calculated based on women's responses. Multinomial logistic regression techniques are employed on a couple dataset from the 1999-2000 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) to investigate the consistency in reporting condom use between husbands and wives. The level of inconsistency in reporting condom use was about 46%, of which about 32% was explained by husbands reporting condom use while wives did not, and 14% by wives reporting condom use while husbands did not. Regression analysis showed that couple education and age difference between the spouses are significant determinants of inconsistent reporting behaviour. The findings suggest the need for alternative approaches (questions) in the DHS to ensure consistency in the collection of data related to use of family planning methods.
夫妻间避孕措施使用情况的报告一致性问题鲜为人知,尤其是在发展中国家。本研究对传统上基于女性报告来衡量避孕普及率的准确性提出了挑战。本文采用多项逻辑回归技术,对来自 1999-2000 年孟加拉国人口与健康调查(DHS)的夫妻数据集进行分析,以调查夫妻双方报告避孕套使用情况的一致性。报告避孕套使用情况的不一致程度约为 46%,其中约 32%是由丈夫报告使用避孕套而妻子未报告解释的,14%是由妻子报告使用避孕套而丈夫未报告解释的。回归分析表明,夫妻教育水平和年龄差异是导致报告不一致行为的重要决定因素。研究结果表明,需要在 DHS 中采用替代方法(问题),以确保与计划生育方法使用相关的数据收集的一致性。