School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, North Terrace 5000, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Chest. 2010 Aug;138(2):315-22. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-2498. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
Previous studies of the qualitative sensation of breathlessness have suggested that greater sensory discomfort is reported as airflow obstruction increases. This study investigated relationships between the language of breathlessness and severity of impairment in subjects with COPD.
Using a prospective, observational approach, subjects completed a structured interview in which they volunteered words to describe their sensation of breathlessness and endorsed statements from a preexisting descriptor list. Global impairment was assessed by the BMI, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE) index. Independent t tests and logistic regression analyses (odds ratios) were used to assess relationships between language categories and severity of impairment.
In this group of 91 people (47 men, 70 +/- 10 years of age, percent predicted FEV(1) 54 +/- 23), subjects volunteering extreme affective descriptors (frightening, awful, worried) had greater impairment (BODE index, perceived respiratory disability, functional exercise capacity, and airways obstruction), and this language category was significantly associated with increasing BODE index scores (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.86; P = .001). Descriptors denoting heavy, rapid, more, shallow, or does not go in or out all the way were significantly less likely to be selected as BODE index scored increased (OR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.93).
Affective descriptors or the emotional response to the sensation of breathlessness have a significant relationship with severity of COPD impairments. Affective descriptors may reflect the degree of threat imposed by the sensation and predict the likelihood of long-term behavioral changes.
先前对呼吸困难的定性感觉的研究表明,随着气流阻塞的增加,报告的感觉不适会更大。本研究调查了 COPD 患者呼吸困难的语言与严重程度之间的关系。
采用前瞻性观察方法,患者完成了一项结构化访谈,在访谈中,他们主动用言语描述自己的呼吸困难感觉,并从预先存在的描述符列表中选择语句。使用 BMI、气流阻塞、呼吸困难和运动能力(BODE)指数评估整体损伤程度。使用独立 t 检验和逻辑回归分析(优势比)来评估语言类别与损伤严重程度之间的关系。
在这组 91 名患者(47 名男性,70 ± 10 岁,预计 FEV1% 为 54 ± 23)中,选择极端情感描述符(可怕、可怕、担心)的患者损伤程度更大(BODE 指数、感知呼吸障碍、功能运动能力和气道阻塞),并且该语言类别与 BODE 指数得分的增加显著相关(优势比 [OR] = 1.49;95% CI,1.18 至 1.86;P =.001)。表示沉重、快速、更多、浅或不完全进出的描述符不太可能被选择为 BODE 指数得分增加(OR = 0.75;95% CI,0.16 至 0.93)。
情感描述符或对呼吸困难感觉的情绪反应与 COPD 损伤的严重程度有显著关系。情感描述符可能反映了感觉带来的威胁程度,并预测长期行为改变的可能性。