IBD Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial/IDIBAPS, CIBER EHD, Barcelona, Spain.
Dig Dis. 2009;27 Suppl 1:111-4. doi: 10.1159/000268130. Epub 2010 Mar 4.
The notion that the intestinal microbiota plays a key role for the development of intestinal inflammation, initially based on a series of clinical observations both in human inflammatory bowel disease and experimental colitis, has been reinforced by a growing body of evidence demonstrating that the abnormal recognition of bacterial and other microbiota antigens by the innate immune system is one of the earliest events in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. In keeping with our present knowledge of inflammatory bowel disease pathophysiology, the search for therapeutic approaches aimed at modifying the composition of the intestinal microbiota to obtain new, more targeted treatments for inflammatory bowel disease that are basically free of side effects has been a subject of intense research activity. Probiotics are defined as live organisms capable of conferring health benefits beyond their nutritional properties. Numerous micro-organisms have been evaluated to induce or maintain remission, or both, in ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and pouchitis. Overall, probiotics have successfully demonstrated some efficacy in some inflammatory bowel disease scenarios. However, a critical review of the available scientific literature shows that: (1) in spite of great expectations, reflected by a high number of review and editorial articles in top journals, the number of published, well-designed clinical trials using probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease is small, often with few patients; (2) the range of microbial agents makes it particularly difficult to draw global conclusions; (3) the quality of the evidence on the efficacy of probiotics in pouchitis is clearly better than that in ulcerative colitis, while there is virtually no evidence of probiotic efficacy in Crohn's disease. The appropriate selection of probiotic agents combined with convincing clinical trials will determine whether probiotics can jump from promise to reality in inflammatory bowel disease clinical practice.
最初,基于一系列在人类炎症性肠病和实验性结肠炎中进行的临床观察,人们认为肠道微生物群在肠道炎症的发展中起着关键作用。越来越多的证据表明,固有免疫系统对细菌和其他微生物群抗原的异常识别是炎症性肠病发病机制中的最早事件之一,这一观点得到了加强。根据我们目前对炎症性肠病病理生理学的认识,寻找旨在改变肠道微生物群组成的治疗方法,以获得新的、更针对炎症性肠病的、基本上没有副作用的治疗方法,一直是一项激烈的研究活动。益生菌被定义为能够赋予营养特性以外的健康益处的活体生物。已经评估了许多微生物来诱导或维持溃疡性结肠炎、克罗恩病和袋炎的缓解,或两者兼而有之。总的来说,益生菌在一些炎症性肠病的情况下已经成功地证明了一些疗效。然而,对现有科学文献的批判性回顾表明:(1)尽管在顶级期刊上发表了大量评论和社论文章,反映了人们的高度期望,但在炎症性肠病中使用益生菌的已发表、精心设计的临床试验数量很少,通常患者也很少;(2)微生物制剂的范围使得很难得出全面的结论;(3)关于益生菌在袋炎中的疗效的证据质量明显优于溃疡性结肠炎,而在克罗恩病中几乎没有益生菌疗效的证据。适当选择益生菌与令人信服的临床试验相结合,将决定益生菌能否在炎症性肠病的临床实践中从承诺变为现实。
Dig Dis. 2010-3-4
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009-6
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004-10
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2006-11
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009-7
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008-6
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2006-10
Int J Mol Sci. 2015-9-1