Carter Tim
Int Marit Health. 2009;60(1-2):1-5.
The text of this paper is based on a presentation at the First International Congress of Maritime, Tropical, and Hyperbaric Medicine, 4th July 2009, Gdynia, Poland. The assessment of fitness to work at sea is an important aspect of maritime risk management. The risks in the industry, the approaches used for assessment, and the evidence on which they are based have changed over time. The transition from an industry in which the nationality of seafarers and the ships on which they worked were the same to one in which ownership and crewing have become global means that, as is true for most other aspects of maritime risk management, compatible international criteria for decisions regarding fitness to work are required. Many parties, including flag states, employers and their insurers, and seafarers and their trade unions, are involved in agreeing international medical fitness criteria. While all have a common interest in improved health and safety at sea, each has their own more detailed agenda of sectional interests. The scope for development of agreed standards and the role of the parties involved is reviewed, and the current arrangements for taking this process forward are discussed. Contributions from maritime health professionals and other medical and scientific experts are essential to the development of rational and valid criteria, but the decisions on the level of authority to be given to these and the means adopted for ensuring compliance with them are essentially political issues where the voice of those with subject knowledge is only one among many in the processes for adoption and implementation of any new arrangements.
本文内容基于2009年7月4日在波兰格但斯克举行的第一届国际海事、热带与高压医学大会上的一次演讲。对海上工作适宜性的评估是海事风险管理的一个重要方面。该行业的风险、评估所采用的方法以及这些方法所依据的证据都随着时间而发生了变化。从一个海员国籍与其工作船舶国籍相同的行业,转变为一个船舶所有权和船员配备已全球化的行业,这意味着,如同海事风险管理的大多数其他方面一样,需要有适用于判定工作适宜性的兼容国际标准。包括船旗国、雇主及其保险公司以及海员及其工会在内的许多方面都参与到商定国际医学适宜标准的过程中。虽然各方在改善海上健康与安全方面有着共同利益,但各自都有更详细的部门利益议程。本文审视了商定标准的发展空间以及相关各方的作用,并讨论了推动这一进程的当前安排。海事健康专业人员以及其他医学和科学专家的贡献对于制定合理有效的标准至关重要,但赋予这些标准的权威级别以及确保遵守这些标准所采用的手段等决策本质上属于政治问题,在任何新安排的采纳和实施过程中,具备专业知识者的声音只是众多声音之一。