Suppr超能文献

评估使用不同夹板材料的多个牙种植体印模的准确性。

Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Ragas Dental College and Hospital, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):38-44.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of casts obtained from nonsplinted and splinted direct impression techniques employing various splinting materials for multiple dental implants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A reference model with four Nobel Replace Select implant replicas in the anterior mandible was fabricated with denture base heat-curing acrylic resin. Impressions of the reference model were made using polyether impression material by direct nonsplinted and splinted techniques. Impressions were divided into four groups: group A: nonsplinted technique; group B: acrylic resin-splinted technique; group C: bite registration addition silicone-splinted technique; and group D: bite registration polyether-splinted technique. Four impressions were made for each group and casts were poured in type IV dental stone. Linear differences in interimplant distances in the x-, y-, and z-axes and differences in interimplant angulations in the z-axis were measured on the casts using a coordinate measuring machine.

RESULTS

The interimplant distance D1y showed significant variations in all four test groups (P = .043), while D3x values varied significantly between the acrylic resin-splinted and silicone-splinted groups. Casts obtained from the polyether-splinted group were the closest to the reference model in the x- and y-axes. In the z-axis, D2z values varied significantly among the three test groups (P = .009). Casts from the acrylic resin-splinted group were the closest to the reference model in the z-axis. Also, one of the three angles measured (angle 2) showed significant differences within three test groups (P = .009). Casts from the nonsplinted group exhibited the smallest angular differences.

CONCLUSION

Casts obtained from all four impression techniques exhibited differences from the reference model. Casts obtained using the bite registration polyether-splinted technique were the most accurate versus the reference model, followed by those obtained via the acrylic resin-splinted, nonsplinted, and bite registration addition silicone-splinted techniques.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用不同夹板材料对多个牙科种植体进行非夹板和夹板直接印模技术获得的印模的准确性。

材料和方法

使用热固化丙烯酸树脂制作带有四个 Nobel Replace Select 种植体模型的参考模型。使用聚醚印模材料通过直接非夹板和夹板技术对参考模型进行印模。将印模分为四组:A 组:非夹板技术;B 组:丙烯酸树脂夹板技术;C 组:咬合记录添加硅橡胶夹板技术;D 组:咬合记录聚醚夹板技术。每组制作四个印模,并将其浇铸在 IV 型牙科石膏中。使用坐标测量机在模型上测量 x、y 和 z 轴上种植体之间的线性距离差异和 z 轴上种植体之间的角度差异。

结果

在所有四个测试组中,种植体间距离 D1y 均显示出显著的变化(P =.043),而在丙烯酸树脂夹板和硅橡胶夹板组之间,D3x 值有显著差异。聚醚夹板组获得的模型在 x 和 y 轴上最接近参考模型。在 z 轴上,三个测试组之间的 D2z 值差异显著(P =.009)。丙烯酸树脂夹板组的模型在 z 轴上最接近参考模型。此外,三个测量角度中的一个(角度 2)在三个测试组之间存在显著差异(P =.009)。非夹板组的模型显示出最小的角度差异。

结论

所有四种印模技术获得的模型都与参考模型存在差异。使用咬合记录聚醚夹板技术获得的模型与参考模型最接近,其次是丙烯酸树脂夹板、非夹板和咬合记录添加硅橡胶夹板技术获得的模型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验