• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[挪威妇科手术后的导管插入程序]

[Catheterization routines after gynecologic surgery in Norway].

作者信息

Schiøtz H A

机构信息

Gynekologisk avdeling, Hamar sjukehus.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1991 Mar 10;111(7):841-3.

PMID:2020952
Abstract

Catheter drainage of the bladder involves a risk of urinary tract infection, and this risk increases with time. A survey was carried out of the routines for bladder drainage after gynecological operations in Norway. There was good correlation between the departments for use of catheter following laparoscopy, laparotomy and caesarean section, but not for retropubic urethrapexy and vaginal plastic operations. The mean drainage time was 0.9 days for minor and 1.3 days for major laparotomy, 1.0 day for caesarean section, 3.4 days for urethrapexy and 3.1 days for vaginal operations. The routines for catheter drainage in Norway are discussed in relation to the risk of infection and retention of urine and it is concluded that a number of departments should reconsider their routines.

摘要

膀胱导管引流存在尿路感染风险,且该风险会随时间增加。挪威开展了一项关于妇科手术后膀胱引流常规操作的调查。腹腔镜检查、剖腹手术和剖宫产术后导管使用情况在各科室之间具有良好的相关性,但耻骨后尿道固定术和阴道整形手术则不然。小型剖腹手术的平均引流时间为0.9天,大型剖腹手术为1.3天,剖宫产为1.0天,尿道固定术为3.4天,阴道手术为3.1天。结合感染风险和尿潴留情况对挪威的导管引流常规操作进行了讨论,得出的结论是一些科室应重新考虑其常规操作。

相似文献

1
[Catheterization routines after gynecologic surgery in Norway].[挪威妇科手术后的导管插入程序]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1991 Mar 10;111(7):841-3.
2
Postoperative voiding, bacteriuria and urinary tract infection with Foley catheterization after gynecological surgery.妇科手术后留置 Foley 导管时的术后排尿、菌尿症和尿路感染
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(4):476-81. doi: 10.1080/00016340500409877.
3
[Advantages and disadvantages of transurethral and suprapubic urinary drainage following gynecologic operations].[妇科手术后经尿道与耻骨上膀胱造瘘引流的利弊]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1984 Sep;44(9):587-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1036309.
4
[Experience with bladder drainage following gynecologic operations].[妇科手术后膀胱引流的经验]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1990 Oct;50(10):794-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026366.
5
A randomized controlled trial comparing short versus long-term catheterization after uncomplicated vaginal prolapse surgery.一项比较单纯阴道脱垂手术后短期与长期导尿的随机对照试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010 Feb;36(1):154-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2009.01096.x.
6
[Suprapubic drainage of the unrinary bladder after gynecological operations (author's transl)].妇科手术后膀胱耻骨上引流(作者译)
Cesk Gynekol. 1979 Dec;44(10):732-6.
7
Clean intermittent catheterization--physical and psychological complications.清洁间歇性导尿——生理和心理并发症
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1993;150:1-69.
8
[The post-operative retained urethral catheter and urinary tract infection in gynecological surgery].[妇科手术中术后留置导尿管与尿路感染]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1987 May;22(3):144-6, 189.
9
[Method for transurethral catheterization for 1-3 days for pelvic floor relaxation in the postoperative period].[术后经尿道插管 1 - 3 天以促进盆底松弛的方法]
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1997 Nov;65:455-7.
10
[The catheterized bladder].[导尿膀胱]
Rev Prat. 2002 Jan 1;52(1):54-7.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing immediate and delayed catheter removal following uncomplicated hysterectomy.一项比较单纯子宫切除术后立即拔除导管与延迟拔除导管的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May;26(5):665-74. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2561-0. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
2
Comparison of 1 and 3 days' transurethral Foley catheterization after retropubic incontinence surgery.耻骨后尿失禁手术后1天与3天经尿道留置 Foley 导尿管的比较。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):98-101. doi: 10.1007/BF01902381.
3
Antiseptic catheter gel and urinary tract infection after short-term postoperative catheterization in women.
女性术后短期留置导尿管时使用抗菌导尿管凝胶与尿路感染
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1996;258(2):97-100. doi: 10.1007/BF00626030.