Suppr超能文献

耻骨后尿失禁手术后1天与3天经尿道留置 Foley 导尿管的比较。

Comparison of 1 and 3 days' transurethral Foley catheterization after retropubic incontinence surgery.

作者信息

Schiøtz H A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vestfold Central Hospital, Tønsberg, Norway.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):98-101. doi: 10.1007/BF01902381.

Abstract

This prospective study was done to see if reducing transurethral Foley catheterization from 3 days to 1 would lead to fewer urinary tract infections without an increase in voiding problems. Ninety-one women undergoing retropubic surgery for stress urinary incontinence (Burch or Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz) were randomized to either 1 or 3 days' catheterization. Antibiotics were not used. Infection was diagnosed in 9 (20.0%) patients in the 1-day group and in 16 (34.8%) in the 3-day group. Delayed voiding occurred in 13 (28.9%) and 10 (21.7%) patients, respectively, and 5 (11.1%) and 3 (6.5%), respectively, received a new catheter. The differences do not reach statistical significance. Therefore, catheter time may safely be reduced to 1 day. This may lead to fewer infections but also somewhat more voiding problems. If a transurethral catheter is to be used, on balance the two regimens are equivalent.

摘要

本前瞻性研究旨在探讨将经尿道留置 Foley 导尿管的时间从 3 天减至 1 天是否会减少尿路感染,同时又不会增加排尿问题。91 名因压力性尿失禁接受耻骨后手术(Burch 或 Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz 手术)的女性被随机分为导尿管留置 1 天组或 3 天组。未使用抗生素。1 天组有 9 名(20.0%)患者被诊断感染,3 天组有 16 名(34.8%)患者被诊断感染。分别有 13 名(28.9%)和 10 名(21.7%)患者出现排尿延迟,分别有 5 名(11.1%)和 3 名(6.5%)患者需要重新留置导尿管。这些差异未达到统计学显著性。因此,导尿管留置时间可安全地减至 1 天。这可能会减少感染,但也会导致更多的排尿问题。如果要使用经尿道导尿管,总体而言这两种方案是等效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验