Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, USA.
J Athl Train. 2010 Mar-Apr;45(2):128-35. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.2.128.
Considerable controversy regarding fluid replacement during exercise currently exists.
To compare fluid turnover between National Football League (NFL) players who have constant fluid access and collegiate football players who replace fluids during water breaks in practices.
Observational study.
Respective preseason training camps of 1 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II (DII) football team and 1 NFL football team. Both morning and afternoon practices for DII players were 2.25 hours in length, and NFL players practiced for 2.25 hours in the morning and 1 hour in the afternoon. Environmental conditions did not differ.
Eight NFL players (4 linemen, 4 backs) and 8 physically matched DII players (4 linemen, 4 backs) participated.
INTERVENTION(S): All players drank fluids only from their predetermined individual containers. The NFL players could consume both water and sports drinks, and the DII players could only consume water.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We measured fluid consumption, sweat rate, total sweat loss, and percentage of sweat loss replaced. Sweat rate was calculated as change in mass adjusted for fluids consumed and urine produced.
Mean sweat rate was not different between NFL (2.1 +/- 0.25 L/h) and DII (1.8 +/- 0.15 L/h) players (F(1,12) = 2, P = .18) but was different between linemen (2.3 +/- 0.2 L/h) and backs (1.6 +/- 0.2 L/h) (t(14) = 3.14, P = .007). We found no differences between NFL and DII players in terms of percentage of weight loss (t(7) = -0.03, P = .98) or rate of fluid consumption (t(7) = -0.76, P = .47). Daily sweat loss was greater in DII (8.0 +/- 2.0 L) than in NFL (6.4 +/- 2.1 L) players (t(7) = -3, P = .02), and fluid consumed was also greater in DII (5.0 +/- 1.5 L) than in NFL (4.0 +/- 1.1 L) players (t(7) = -2.8, P = .026). We found a correlation between sweat loss and fluids consumed (r = 0.79, P < .001).
During preseason practices, the DII players drinking water at water breaks replaced the same volume of fluid (66% of weight lost) as NFL players with constant access to both water and sports drinks.
目前,关于运动时补液的争议相当大。
比较经常补液的国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)运动员和在练习时通过补水点补水的大学生橄榄球运动员之间的液体周转率。
观察性研究。
1 支美国大学生体育协会第二分部(DII)橄榄球队和 1 支 NFL 橄榄球队各自的季前训练营。DII 运动员的晨练和下午练习时长均为 2.25 小时,NFL 运动员上午练习 2.25 小时,下午练习 1 小时。环境条件没有差异。
8 名 NFL 运动员(4 名前锋,4 名后卫)和 8 名身体条件匹配的 DII 运动员(4 名前锋,4 名后卫)参加了研究。
所有运动员仅从他们预定的个人容器中摄入液体。NFL 运动员可以饮用水和运动饮料,而 DII 运动员只能饮用水。
我们测量了液体摄入量、出汗率、总出汗量和出汗量的替代百分比。出汗率通过调整为摄入的液体和产生的尿液的质量变化来计算。
NFL 运动员(2.1±0.25 L/h)和 DII 运动员(1.8±0.15 L/h)之间的平均出汗率无差异(F(1,12)=2,P=.18),但前锋(2.3±0.2 L/h)和后卫(1.6±0.2 L/h)之间有差异(t(14)=3.14,P=.007)。NFL 运动员和 DII 运动员在体重减轻百分比(t(7)=-0.03,P=.98)或液体摄入速率(t(7)=-0.76,P=.47)方面没有差异。DII 运动员的日出汗量(8.0±2.0 L)大于 NFL 运动员(6.4±2.1 L)(t(7)=-3,P=.02),DII 运动员摄入的液体量(5.0±1.5 L)也大于 NFL 运动员(4.0±1.1 L)(t(7)=-2.8,P=.026)。我们发现出汗量和液体摄入量之间存在相关性(r=0.79,P<.001)。
在季前训练期间,DII 运动员在补水点饮水,可补充与 NFL 运动员等量的液体(丢失体重的 66%),而 NFL 运动员可随时获得水和运动饮料。