Hume Clare, van der Horst Klazine, Brug Johannes, Salmon Jo, Oenema Anke
Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010 Apr;5(2):161-8. doi: 10.3109/17477160903242550.
To examine associations between social ecological factors and Dutch adolescents' TV viewing.
Cross-sectional examination of predictors of adolescents' TV viewing.
A total of 338 adolescents, aged 14 years (55% boys).
Adolescents self-reported their age, ethnicity and TV viewing (dichotomized at two hours/day) and responded to items from all three social ecological domains; individual (cognitions based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and TV viewing habit strength, and other behaviours, such as computer use), social (parental rules about TV viewing and parental TV viewing behavior) and physical environmental factors (TV in bedroom, physical activity equipment available). Parents reported demographic factors (e.g., ethnicity, education level), and their own TV viewing (mins/day); adolescents' weight status (not overweight vs. overweight/obese) was calculated from objective measures of height and weight. Logistic regression analyses examined associations between socio-ecological factors and adolescents' TV viewing, and whether associations were moderated by adolescents' sex, parents' education and ethnicity.
Compared with others, overweight/obese adolescents (odds ratio (OR)=3.0; p<or=0.001), those with high computer use (OR=2.3; p<or=0.0001), with high TV viewing habit strength (OR=1.3; p<or=0.0001), and those whose parents had high levels of TV viewing (OR=2.4; p<or=0.01) were more likely to exceed two hours of TV viewing per day. The association with habit strength was moderated by gender, and the association with parents' TV viewing was moderated by parents' education and ethnicity.
Interventions should target parents' TV viewing behaviors and aim to amend habitual, 'mindless' TV viewing among adolescents.
探讨社会生态因素与荷兰青少年看电视之间的关联。
对青少年看电视的预测因素进行横断面研究。
共338名14岁青少年(55%为男孩)。
青少年自行报告年龄、种族和看电视情况(以每天两小时为界进行二分法划分),并回答来自所有三个社会生态领域的问题;个体因素(基于计划行为理论的认知、看电视习惯强度以及其他行为,如使用电脑)、社会因素(父母关于看电视的规定以及父母看电视的行为)和物理环境因素(卧室里有电视、有体育活动器材)。父母报告人口统计学因素(如种族、教育水平)以及他们自己看电视的情况(分钟/天);根据身高和体重的客观测量数据计算青少年的体重状况(非超重与超重/肥胖)。采用逻辑回归分析探讨社会生态因素与青少年看电视之间的关联,以及这些关联是否受到青少年性别、父母教育程度和种族的调节。
与其他人相比,超重/肥胖青少年(优势比(OR)=3.0;p≤0.001)、使用电脑时间长的青少年(OR=2.3;p≤0.0001)、看电视习惯强度高的青少年(OR=1.3;p≤0.0001)以及父母看电视时间长的青少年(OR=2.4;p≤0.01)每天看电视超过两小时的可能性更大。与习惯强度之间的关联受到性别的调节,与父母看电视之间的关联受到父母教育程度和种族的调节。
干预措施应针对父母看电视的行为,旨在改变青少年习惯性的、“无意识的”看电视行为。