Suppr超能文献

一般和具体的媒体育儿方法:当前测量方法、与屏幕观看的关联以及测量意义的系统综述。

General and specific approaches to media parenting: a systematic review of current measures, associations with screen-viewing, and measurement implications.

机构信息

Centre for Exercise, Nutrition, and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Child Obes. 2013 Aug;9 Suppl(Suppl 1):S51-72. doi: 10.1089/chi.2013.0031.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parent-focused interventions may help to reduce youth screen-viewing (SV). This review synthesized current information on the links between parenting styles, parenting practices, and youth SV with a focus on measurement.

METHODS

A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted.

RESULTS

In all, 29 of 1189 studies met the inclusion criteria. Parenting practices were divided into rule and nonrule-based practices. Seven rules: (1) Limits on total time (n studies=23); (2) limits on time of day (n=7); (3) content restriction (n=11); (4) mealtime rules (n=2); (5) parental supervision (n=3); (6) contingent screentime (n=3); and (7) no-TV policy (n=1) were reported. Two nonrule-based practices were reported: Co-viewing (n=6) and encouragement to view (n=2). Three studies (10.3%) provided information on parenting styles. Only 12 studies (41.4%) provided information on the reliability/validity of the outcome measure, 15 (51.7%) studies provided information on the reliability/validity of the parenting measure, and 6 (20.7%) provided information on the reliability/validity of both outcome and exposure measures.

CONCLUSIONS

There is mixed evidence that parenting styles and media-related parenting practices are associated with youth SV. The assessment of parental influence of youth media use is hampered by the diversity of measures that have been used. There is a need for new measures that assess a range of media parenting practices that are relevant to multiple forms of SV.

摘要

背景

以家长为中心的干预措施可能有助于减少青少年的屏幕观看(SV)。本综述综合了目前关于父母教养方式、教养实践与青少年 SV 之间关系的信息,重点是测量方法。

方法

对电子数据库进行了系统综述。

结果

在总共 1189 项研究中,有 29 项符合纳入标准。教养实践分为基于规则和非基于规则的实践。有 7 项规则:(1)总时间限制(n 项研究=23);(2)时间限制(n=7);(3)内容限制(n=11);(4)用餐时间规则(n=2);(5)父母监督(n=3);(6)有条件的屏幕时间(n=3);(7)无电视政策(n=1)。有 2 项非基于规则的实践:共同观看(n=6)和鼓励观看(n=2)。有 3 项研究(10.3%)提供了有关教养风格的信息。只有 12 项研究(41.4%)提供了关于结果测量可靠性/有效性的信息,15 项研究(51.7%)提供了关于教养测量可靠性/有效性的信息,6 项研究(20.7%)提供了关于结果和暴露测量可靠性/有效性的信息。

结论

有混合证据表明,父母教养方式和与媒体相关的教养实践与青少年 SV 有关。由于使用的测量方法多种多样,对父母对青少年媒体使用的影响的评估受到了阻碍。需要新的措施来评估与多种 SV 形式相关的一系列媒体育儿实践。

相似文献

7
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability.针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Adolescent screen time and rules to limit screen time in the home.青少年屏幕时间和家庭限制屏幕时间的规则。
J Adolesc Health. 2011 Apr;48(4):379-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
7
Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines for children and youth.加拿大儿童和青少年久坐行为指南。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Feb;36(1):59-64; 65-71. doi: 10.1139/H11-012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验