School of Sport Science, Exercise and Health, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Aug 17;10:99. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-99.
The home environment is an important influence on the sedentary behaviour and physical activity of children, who have limited independent mobility and spend much of their time at home. This article reviews the current evidence regarding the influence of the home physical environment on the sedentary behaviour and physical activity of children aged 8-14 years. A literature search of peer reviewed articles published between 2005 and 2011 resulted in 38 observational studies (21 with activity outcomes, 23 with sedentary outcomes) and 11 experimental studies included in the review. The most commonly investigated behavioural outcomes were television watching and moderate to vigorous physical activity. Media equipment in the home and to a lesser extent the bedroom were positively associated with children's sedentary behaviour. Physical activity equipment and the house and yard were not associated with physical activity, although environmental measures were exclusively self-reported. On the other hand, physical activity equipment was inversely associated with sedentary behaviours in half of studies. Observational studies that investigated the influence of the physical and social environment within the home space, found that the social environment, particularly the role of parents, was important. Experimental studies that changed the home physical environment by introducing a television limiting device successfully decreased television viewing, whereas the influence of introducing an active video game on activity outcomes was inconsistent. Results highlight that the home environment is an important influence on children's sedentary behaviour and physical activity, about which much is still unknown. While changing or controlling the home physical environment shows promise for reducing screen based sedentary behaviour, further interventions are needed to understand the broader impact of these changes. Future studies should prioritise investigating the influence of the home physical environment, and its interaction with the social environment, on objectively measured sedentary time and home context specific behaviours, ideally including technologies that allow objective measures of the home space.
家庭环境是影响儿童久坐行为和身体活动的一个重要因素,因为儿童的独立活动能力有限,大部分时间都在家中度过。本文综述了家庭物理环境对 8-14 岁儿童久坐行为和身体活动影响的现有证据。对 2005 年至 2011 年间发表的同行评议文章进行了文献检索,结果纳入了 38 项观察性研究(21 项与活动结果相关,23 项与久坐结果相关)和 11 项实验研究。最常调查的行为结果是看电视和中等到剧烈的身体活动。家庭中的媒体设备,尤其是卧室中的媒体设备,与儿童的久坐行为呈正相关。身体活动设备以及房屋和院子与身体活动无关,尽管环境措施完全是自我报告的。另一方面,有一半的研究表明,身体活动设备与久坐行为呈负相关。调查家庭内部物理和社会环境影响的观察性研究发现,社会环境,尤其是父母的作用,非常重要。通过引入电视限制装置改变家庭物理环境的实验研究成功地减少了看电视的时间,而引入积极的视频游戏对活动结果的影响则不一致。结果表明,家庭环境是影响儿童久坐行为和身体活动的一个重要因素,但仍有许多未知因素。虽然改变或控制家庭物理环境显示出减少基于屏幕的久坐行为的潜力,但仍需要进一步的干预措施来了解这些变化的更广泛影响。未来的研究应优先调查家庭物理环境及其与社会环境的相互作用对客观测量的久坐时间和家庭环境特定行为的影响,理想情况下还应包括允许对家庭空间进行客观测量的技术。