Camilli A E, Robbins D R, Lebowitz M D
Division of Respiratory Sciences, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson 85724.
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Apr 15;133(8):795-800. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115958.
Death certificate reporting of chronic airways disease was examined during 13 years of follow-up in the Tucson Epidemiologic Study of Airways Obstructive Disease. The Tucson study population is a geographically clustered stratified random sample of white, non-Mexican-American households in Tucson, Arizona. The initial survey was performed in 1972-1973. Using clinical and physiologic criteria from nine surveys to define airways obstructive disease in the population, the authors compared death certificate reporting with these criteria as the underlying cause and as reported anywhere on the death certificate. Reporting was related to the degree of antemortem airways obstruction. Sex differences in reporting were also noted. Females showed greater rates of reporting at low levels of impairment while males showed greater reporting at high levels of impairment. When airways obstructive disease was not the underlying cause of death, the type of underlying cause was found to affect reporting of airways obstructive disease on the death certificate.
在图森气道阻塞性疾病流行病学研究的13年随访期间,对慢性气道疾病的死亡证明报告情况进行了检查。图森研究人群是亚利桑那州图森市白人、非墨西哥裔美国家庭的地理聚集分层随机样本。初始调查于1972年至1973年进行。作者使用九次调查中的临床和生理标准来定义人群中的气道阻塞性疾病,将死亡证明报告与这些标准作为根本原因以及在死亡证明上任何位置报告的情况进行了比较。报告与死前气道阻塞程度有关。还注意到报告中的性别差异。女性在低损伤水平时报告率较高,而男性在高损伤水平时报告率较高。当气道阻塞性疾病不是死亡的根本原因时,发现根本原因的类型会影响死亡证明上气道阻塞性疾病的报告。