Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 May;54(5):2119-24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01450-09. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
The worldwide increase in fluoroquinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae pathogens has led to doripenem and other carbapenems assuming a greater role in the treatment of serious infections. We analyzed data from 6 phase 3 multinational doripenem clinical trials on ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates consisting of all genera (CIPRE) and ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates consisting of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Proteus spp. with ceftazidime MICs of >or=2 microg/ml (ESBLE) for prevalence by geographic region and disease type, in vitro activities of doripenem and comparator agents, and clinical or microbiologic outcomes in doripenem- and comparator-treated patients across disease types (complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], complicated urinary tract infection [cUTI], and nosocomial pneumonia [NP]). Of 1,830 baseline Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 88 (4.8%) were ESBLE and 238 (13.0%) were CIPRE. The incidence of ESBLE was greatest in Europe (7.8%); that of CIPRE was higher in South America (15.9%) and Europe (14.4%). ESBLE incidence was highest in NP (12.9%) cases; that of CIPRE was higher in cUTI (18.3%) and NP (14.9%) cases. Against ESBLE and CIPRE, carbapenems appeared more active than other antibiotic classes. Among carbapenems, doripenem and meropenem were most potent. Doripenem had low MIC(90)s for CIPRE (0.5 microg/ml) and ESBLE (0.25 microg/ml). Doripenem and comparators were highly clinically effective in infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae, irrespective of their ESBL statuses. The overall cure rates were the same for doripenem (82%; 564/685) and the comparators (82%; 535/652) and similar for ESBLE (73% [16/22] versus 72% [21/29]) and CIPRE (68% [47/69] versus 52% [33/64]). These findings indicate that doripenem is an important therapeutic option for treating serious infections caused by ESBLE and CIPRE.
氟喹诺酮类耐药和产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)肠杆菌科病原体在全球范围内的增加,导致多利培南和其他碳青霉烯类药物在治疗严重感染方面发挥了更大的作用。我们分析了来自 6 项多利培南 3 期多国临床试验的数据,这些试验涉及对所有属(CIPRE)的环丙沙星耐药肠杆菌科分离株和头孢他啶 MIC 值>或=2μg/ml(ESBLE)的产 ESBL 肠杆菌科分离株(包括大肠埃希菌、克雷伯菌属和变形杆菌属),研究了按地理区域和疾病类型划分的患病率、多利培南和对照药物的体外活性,以及在跨疾病类型(复杂性腹腔内感染[cIAI]、复杂性尿路感染[cUTI]和医院获得性肺炎[NP])接受多利培南和对照药物治疗的患者的临床或微生物学结局。在 1830 例基线肠杆菌科分离株中,88 例(4.8%)为 ESBLE,238 例(13.0%)为 CIPRE。ESBLE 的发生率在欧洲最高(7.8%);在南美洲和欧洲(14.4%),CIPRE 的发生率更高。ESBLE 的发生率在 NP(12.9%)病例中最高;在 cUTI(18.3%)和 NP(14.9%)病例中,CIPRE 的发生率更高。与 ESBLE 和 CIPRE 相比,碳青霉烯类药物的活性似乎高于其他抗生素类别。在碳青霉烯类药物中,多利培南和美罗培南的抗菌作用最强。多利培南对 CIPRE(0.5μg/ml)和 ESBLE(0.25μg/ml)的 MIC90 较低。多利培南和对照药物在肠杆菌科感染中的临床疗效均很高,与 ESBL 状态无关。多利培南(82%;564/685)和对照药物(82%;535/652)的总体治愈率相同,ESBLE(73%[16/22]与 72%[21/29])和 CIPRE(68%[47/69]与 52%[33/64])的治愈率也相似。这些发现表明,多利培南是治疗 ESBLE 和 CIPRE 引起的严重感染的重要治疗选择。