McMillan D, Lee S, Serediak M, Finn J, Saigal S, Walker C
University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta;
Paediatr Child Health. 1999 Jan;4(1):51-6. doi: 10.1093/pch/4.1.51.
There have been publically expressed concerns about the costs and allocation of neonatal and perinatal health care resources in Canada and elsewhere for the past 15 years. This paper reports information from a symposium held during the 1996 Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) annual meeting sponsored by the CPS Section on Perinatal Medicine. Experts in perinatal epidemiology, health care economics, public policy and finance, and consumer perspectives on the outcomes of neonatal and perinatal intensive care explored the following questions: How should the need for health care resources in the neonatal and perinatal area be objectively determined? When there are competing needs between the maternal-newborn area and other areas, how should these be rationalized? What evidence should be used (or should be available) to support the present use of resources? What evidence should be available (or is needed) to change or introduce new uses of resources? The conclusions indicated that there are no generally accepted methods to determine the allocation of health care resources but that considerations need to include population characteristics, desired outcomes, achievable results, values, ethics, legalities, cost-benefit analyses and political objectives. Information from families and adolescents who required the use of high technology and/or high cost programs will contribute individual, family and societal values that complement cost-efficacy analyses.
在过去15年里,加拿大及其他地区一直有人公开表达对新生儿和围产期医疗保健资源成本及分配的担忧。本文报告了在加拿大儿科学会(CPS)围产医学分会主办的1996年加拿大儿科学会年会上举行的一次研讨会的信息。围产流行病学、医疗保健经济学、公共政策与财政以及消费者对新生儿和围产期重症监护结果的看法等领域的专家探讨了以下问题:如何客观确定新生儿和围产期医疗保健资源的需求?当母婴领域与其他领域存在相互竞争的需求时,应如何合理协调?应使用(或应具备)哪些证据来支持当前的资源使用情况?应具备(或需要)哪些证据来改变或引入资源的新用途?结论表明,目前尚无普遍认可的方法来确定医疗保健资源的分配,但考虑因素应包括人口特征、期望结果、可实现的成果、价值观、伦理、合法性、成本效益分析以及政治目标。来自需要使用高科技和/或高成本项目的家庭及青少年的信息,将为补充成本效益分析贡献个人、家庭和社会价值观。