Department of Health Sciences, Centre for Biostatistics and Genetic Epidemiology, University of Leicester, 2nd Floor, Adrian Building, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K.
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):885-95. doi: 10.1002/sim.3762.
Relative survival is used extensively in population-based cancer studies to measure patient survival correcting for causes of death not related to the disease of interest. An advantage of relative survival is that it provides a measure of mortality associated with a particular disease, without the need for information on cause of death. Relative survival provides a measure of net mortality, i.e. the probability of death due to cancer in the absence of other causes. This is a useful measure, but it is also of interest to measure crude mortality, i.e. the probability of death due to cancer in the presence of other causes. A previous approach to estimate the crude probability of death in population-based cancer studies used life table methods, but we show how the estimates can be obtained after fitting a relative survival model. We adopt flexible parametric models for relative survival, which use restricted cubic splines for the baseline cumulative excess hazard and for any time-dependent effects. We illustrate the approach using an example of men diagnosed with prostate cancer in England and Wales showing the differences in net and crude survival for different ages.
相对生存率在基于人群的癌症研究中被广泛用于测量患者的生存情况,方法是校正与研究疾病无关的死亡原因。相对生存率的一个优点是,它提供了一种与特定疾病相关的死亡率衡量标准,而无需死亡原因信息。相对生存率提供了一种净死亡率的衡量标准,即没有其他原因导致的癌症死亡的概率。这是一个有用的衡量标准,但也有兴趣衡量粗死亡率,即有其他原因导致的癌症死亡的概率。以前在基于人群的癌症研究中估计粗死亡率的方法是使用寿命表方法,但我们展示了如何在拟合相对生存率模型后获得这些估计值。我们采用了相对生存率的灵活参数模型,这些模型对基线累积超额风险和任何时变效应使用限制立方样条。我们使用在英格兰和威尔士诊断出前列腺癌的男性的一个例子来说明这种方法,展示了不同年龄的净生存率和粗生存率的差异。