• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

580例食管吻合术中单层连续手工缝合方法与圆形吻合器吻合的比较。

Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses.

作者信息

Fok M, Ah-Chong A K, Cheng S W, Wong J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1991 Mar;78(3):342-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780323.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.1800780323
PMID:2021852
Abstract

A total of 611 patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus or gastric cardia were operated on between July 1982 and December 1989. Resection was performed in 491 patients (one-stage, 483; two-stage, eight), bypass operation in 97, and 23 had exploration alone. The anastomoses of 580 patients with one-stage resection and bypass operations were evaluated. Hand-sewn anastomosis using a single layer of continuous absorbable monofilament suture was performed in 304 patients (221 resections and 83 bypasses). A stapled anastomosis was performed on 276 patients (262 resections and 14 bypasses). Following resection, there were 11 (5 per cent) anastomotic leaks in the hand-sewn group and ten (3.8 per cent) in the stapled anastomosis group (P = 0.69). Excluding anastomotic leaks, hospital mortality and anastomotic recurrence, stricture occurred in 18 of 172 hand-sewn anastomoses (10.5 per cent) and in 57 of 195 stapled anastomoses (29.2 per cent) (P less than 0.001). In patients who had bypass operations there were 12 anastomotic leaks, ten in the hand-sewn group (12.0 per cent) and two in the stapled anastomosis group (14.3 per cent). Only two of the discharged patients with bypass developed anastomotic strictures, a low incidence probably because of short survival. In addition, there were 245 subsidiary anastomoses made in the abdomen by the hand-sewn method as part of the reconstructive procedure, and there was one leak. The results of this non-randomized study suggest that hand-sewn anastomosis using a single layer continuous technique for the oesophagus is as safe as the use of circular staplers; hand-sewn anastomosis is less likely to become stenotic.

摘要

1982年7月至1989年12月期间,共有611例食管癌或贲门癌患者接受了手术治疗。491例患者进行了切除手术(一期手术483例,二期手术8例),97例患者进行了旁路手术,23例患者仅进行了探查。对580例行一期切除和旁路手术患者的吻合情况进行了评估。304例患者(221例切除手术和83例旁路手术)采用单层连续可吸收单丝缝线进行手工缝合吻合。276例患者(262例切除手术和14例旁路手术)进行了吻合器吻合。切除术后,手工缝合组有11例(5%)吻合口漏,吻合器吻合组有10例(3.8%)(P = 0.69)。排除吻合口漏、医院死亡率和吻合口复发情况,172例手工缝合吻合中有18例(10.5%)发生狭窄,195例吻合器吻合中有57例(29.2%)发生狭窄(P<0.001)。接受旁路手术的患者中有12例吻合口漏,手工缝合组10例(12.0%),吻合器吻合组2例(14.3%)。旁路手术出院患者中只有2例发生吻合口狭窄,发生率较低,可能是因为生存期短。此外,作为重建手术的一部分,通过手工缝合方法在腹部进行了245例辅助吻合,有1例发生漏。这项非随机研究结果表明,食管单层连续技术手工缝合吻合与使用圆形吻合器一样安全;手工缝合吻合发生狭窄的可能性较小。

相似文献

1
Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses.580例食管吻合术中单层连续手工缝合方法与圆形吻合器吻合的比较。
Br J Surg. 1991 Mar;78(3):342-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780323.
2
Comparison of stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomoses.吻合器与手工缝合食管胃吻合术的比较。
Am J Surg. 1998 Apr;175(4):337-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00002-6.
3
Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.三种胸段食管胃吻合技术的倾向匹配分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 May;83(5):1805-13; discussion 1813. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.046.
4
Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.食管癌切除术后手工缝合与吻合器食管胃吻合术的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 1997 Aug;226(2):169-73. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199708000-00008.
5
Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.食管鳞状细胞癌切除术后手工与机械颈段食管胃吻合术的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Jun;25(6):1097-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.02.026.
6
Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.胸段食管癌切除术后颈部手工缝合与圆形吻合器食管胃吻合术的比较:倾向评分匹配分析
Dis Esophagus. 2023 Feb 24;36(3). doi: 10.1093/dote/doac066.
7
Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy for cancer. A comparison of neck and chest anastomoses.食管癌切除术后的吻合口并发症。颈部与胸部吻合的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 Aug;104(2):395-400.
8
Sutures, staplers, leaks and strictures. A review of anastomoses in oesophageal resection at Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast 1977-1986.缝线、吻合器、渗漏与狭窄。对1977年至1986年贝尔法斯特皇家维多利亚医院食管切除术吻合情况的回顾。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1990;4(2):97-100. doi: 10.1016/1010-7940(90)90222-l.
9
Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.经胸食管切除术治疗胸下段食管癌患者中食管胃端侧手工吻合与侧侧吻合的比较:伊朗回顾性队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 31;20(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01393-x.
10
Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique.胃癌胃切除术后的食管吻合术:手工缝合与吻合器技术的比较
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 Jul-Aug;47(34):1026-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel intraoperative Esophagus-Sparing Anastomotic Narrowing Revision (ESANR) technique for patients who underwent esophagojejunostomy: three case reports and a review of the literature.一种用于接受食管空肠吻合术患者的新型术中保留食管吻合口狭窄修复(ESANR)技术:三例病例报告及文献综述
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec 30;22(1):353. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03647-4.
2
Risk factors for esophageal anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis.食管癌术后食管吻合口狭窄的危险因素:荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12625-8.
3
Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Esophago-jejunal Anastomosis During Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in 72 Patients: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study in Poland.
72 例胃癌全胃切除术中手工缝合与吻合器吻合食管空肠吻合术的术后结果比较:波兰单中心回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Jan 26;29:e938759. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938759.
4
End-to-end intestinal anastomosis using a novel biodegradable stent for laparoscopic colonic surgery: a multicenter study.采用新型可生物降解支架进行腹腔镜结肠手术的全肠道吻合:一项多中心研究。
Surg Today. 2019 Dec;49(12):1003-1012. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01841-6. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
5
Comparison of hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis in esophageal cancer: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.食管癌手工缝合与机械食管胃吻合术的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15676. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015676.
6
Fallback technique with circular stapler prevents anastomotic obstruction after esophagectomy: A case report of surgical approach.使用圆形吻合器的补救技术可预防食管切除术后吻合口梗阻:手术方法的病例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(8):e13571. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013571.
7
Triple-stapled quadrilateral anastomosis: a new technique for creation of an esophagogastric anastomosis.三吻合器四边形吻合术:一种新的食管胃吻合技术。
Esophagus. 2018 Apr;15(2):88-94. doi: 10.1007/s10388-017-0599-z. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
8
Laparoscopic colonic anastomosis using a degradable stent in a porcine model.在猪模型中使用可降解支架进行腹腔镜结肠吻合术。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 May 21;22(19):4707-15. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i19.4707.
9
Partial esophagogastrostomy with esophagogastric anastomosis below the aortic arch in cardiac carcinoma: characteristics and treatment of postoperative anastomotic leakage.贲门癌主动脉弓下食管胃吻合部分食管胃造口术:术后吻合口漏的特征与治疗
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Nov;7(11):1994-2002. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.13.
10
The Use of a Mechanical Stapler in Jejunal Free Flaps in Laryngopharyngectomy Defects.机械吻合器在喉咽切除术缺损空肠游离皮瓣中的应用
Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Nov;42(6):815-8. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.6.815. Epub 2015 Nov 16.