McManus K G, Ritchie A J, McGuigan J, Stevenson H M, Gibbons J R
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1990;4(2):97-100. doi: 10.1016/1010-7940(90)90222-l.
Leakage from an oesophagogastric anastomosis has a high morbidity and mortality. Recent evidence suggests that mechanical tissue stapling devices can decrease the rate of anastomotic breakdown but at the expense of an increase in the occurrence of fibrotic strictures at the anastomosis site. This study examines the rate of leakage and stricture in hand sutured and stapled anastomoses. A retrospective study was made of 221 oesophagogastric anastomoses following resection for carcinoma between 1977 and 1986. There were 122 sutured and 99 stapled anastomoses. Leak occurred in 21 sutured (17.2%) and 7 stapled (7.1%), P less than 0.05. If the stapled anastomosis was completely satisfactory and required no reinforcing sutures, the breakdown rate was in fact only 3% (2/69), P less than 0.01. A stapled anastomosis which required reinforcement had a similar chance of breakdown as a sutured anastomosis (16.7%). There was little difference in the performance of registrars in training and consultants at hand-sewn anastomoses with leakage rates of 13.7% and 18%, respectively; P greater than 0.05. The registrars, however, did not improve with the use of the stapler with a leakage rate of 14.3% compared to the consultants' rate of 1.75%, P less than 0.05. Involvement of the limits of resection with tumour slightly favoured breakdown--15.5% compared to 11.6% if the limits were free from tumour, P greater than 0.05. The incidence of malignant strictures was similar in both groups but benign stricture was more common in the stapled group--13% (13/99) compared to 1.6% (2/122), P less than 0.01. The mechanical stapler brings uniformity to the anastomosis but cannot compensate for deficiencies in surgical technique.
食管胃吻合口漏具有较高的发病率和死亡率。近期证据表明,机械组织缝合器械可降低吻合口破裂率,但代价是吻合口部位纤维化狭窄的发生率增加。本研究考察了手工缝合和器械吻合的漏出率及狭窄情况。对1977年至1986年间因癌行切除术后的221例食管胃吻合进行了回顾性研究。其中手工缝合吻合122例,器械吻合99例。手工缝合组有21例(17.2%)发生漏出,器械吻合组有7例(7.1%)发生漏出,P<0.05。如果器械吻合完全满意且无需加固缝合,其破裂率实际上仅为3%(2/69),P<0.01。需要加固的器械吻合发生破裂的几率与手工缝合吻合相似(16.7%)。接受培训的住院医师和顾问医师在进行手工缝合吻合时的表现差异不大,漏出率分别为13.7%和18%;P>0.05。然而,住院医师使用吻合器后漏出率为14.3%,而顾问医师的漏出率为1.75%,两者相比P<0.05,即住院医师使用吻合器后并未改善情况。肿瘤累及切除范围时发生破裂的情况略多——为15.5%,而切除范围无肿瘤累及者为11.6%,P>0.05。两组恶性狭窄的发生率相似,但器械吻合组良性狭窄更为常见——为13%(13/99),而手工缝合组为1.6%(2/122),P<0.01。机械吻合器使吻合更均匀,但无法弥补手术技术上的不足。