Social Science Research Centre, 10785 Berlin, Germany.
Med Teach. 2010;32(3):e127-32. doi: 10.3109/01421590903449902.
A seminar course was developed in order to train medical students in qualitative research methods, while providing an introduction to the field of General Practice. Students were enabled to conduct semi-structured interviews with general practitioners (GPs), during which they learned about the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of frequently encountered medical problems. The course was carried out four times at two universities in Germany.
The study explores the students' learning experiences focusing on their research experience.
Data were collected in four focus groups and analyzed.
The students perceived the course as very different from their usual medical education. This was appreciated, but also caused some difficulties. Three themes emerged: (1) Missing 'facts', (2) New horizons: 'Thinking outside the box', and (3) The challenge of interpretation: 'Reading between the lines'.
Learning qualitative research methods can be particularly challenging for medical students as the tasks and epistemology of qualitative research run counter to the usual learning formats and research paradigms in medical education. When teaching qualitative research, special care should be taken to address the cognitive dissonance experienced by students and to explain the unique contribution of qualitative research to medical practice and the field of General Practice especially.
为了培养医学生的定性研究方法,并介绍全科医学领域,开设了一门研讨课。学生们能够对全科医生进行半结构化访谈,了解常见医学问题的预防、诊断和治疗。该课程在德国的两所大学进行了四次。
本研究重点探讨学生的研究经验,以了解他们的学习经历。
通过四个焦点小组收集数据并进行分析。
学生们认为该课程与他们通常的医学教育非常不同。他们对此表示赞赏,但也带来了一些困难。出现了三个主题:(1)缺失“事实”,(2)新视野:“跳出框框思考”,以及(3)解释的挑战:“字里行间的阅读”。
对于医学生来说,学习定性研究方法可能特别具有挑战性,因为定性研究的任务和认识论与医学教育中的常用学习格式和研究范式背道而驰。在教授定性研究时,应特别注意解决学生的认知失调问题,并解释定性研究对医学实践和全科医学领域的独特贡献。