文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

院前指数评估、高速撞击存在情况以及急救医疗技术员判断作为创伤分诊标准。

Evaluation of the Prehospital Index, presence of high-velocity impact and judgment of emergency medical technicians as criteria for trauma triage.

机构信息

Unité de recherche en traumatologie urgence soins intensifs, Centre de recherche du CHA (Hôpital de l'Enfant Jésus), Québec City, Québec.

出版信息

CJEM. 2010 Mar;12(2):111-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012136.


DOI:10.1017/s1481803500012136
PMID:20219158
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the performance of the Prehospital Index (PHI), the high velocity impact (HVI) criterion and emergency medical technician (EMT) judgment for the prehospital triage of injured patients. METHODS: The study population included all prehospital trauma patients transported by an emergency medical service to 2 level I trauma centres for adults. All prehospital run sheets were linked to trauma registry data. The main outcome was severe trauma, defined as death within 72 hours, admission to the intensive care unit within 24 hours or an Injury Severity Score greater than 15. We assessed sensitivity, specificity and rates of overtriage. RESULTS: Of 16,805 patients in the study population, 1113 (6.62%) had severe trauma. The combination of all 3 triage criteria (PHI score > or = 4, HVI presence and EMT judgment) performed best for identifying patients with severe trauma, with a sensitivity of 74.2% but with an overtriage rate of 85.1%. Alone, EMT judgment had the highest sensitivity and a PHI score of 4 or greater had the low est rate of overtriage. CONCLUSION: Although the combination of PHI score, HVI presence and EMT judgment offers the highest sensitivity for the identification of patients that could benefit from direct transport to a level I trauma centre, overall sensitivity remains low and over triage is high. More research is required to improve prehospital triage.

摘要

目的:我们旨在评估院前指数(PHI)、高速撞击(HVI)标准和急救医疗技术员(EMT)判断在院前分诊受伤患者中的表现。

方法:研究人群包括通过紧急医疗服务送往 2 家成人 I 级创伤中心的所有院前创伤患者。所有院前运行表都与创伤登记数据相关联。主要结局是严重创伤,定义为 72 小时内死亡、24 小时内入住重症监护病房或损伤严重程度评分大于 15。我们评估了敏感性、特异性和过度分诊率。

结果:在研究人群的 16805 名患者中,有 1113 名(6.62%)发生严重创伤。所有 3 种分诊标准(PHI 评分≥4、HVI 存在和 EMT 判断)结合起来,对识别严重创伤患者的效果最佳,其敏感性为 74.2%,但过度分诊率为 85.1%。单独来看,EMT 判断的敏感性最高,PHI 评分≥4 的患者过度分诊率最低。

结论:尽管 PHI 评分、HVI 存在和 EMT 判断的组合提供了识别可能受益于直接转运到 I 级创伤中心的患者的最高敏感性,但总体敏感性仍然较低,过度分诊率较高。需要进一步研究以改善院前分诊。

相似文献

[1]
Evaluation of the Prehospital Index, presence of high-velocity impact and judgment of emergency medical technicians as criteria for trauma triage.

CJEM. 2010-3

[2]
A comparison of EMT judgment and prehospital trauma triage instruments.

J Trauma. 1991-10

[3]
The role of emergency medical service providers in the decision-making process of prehospital trauma triage.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020-2

[4]
Accuracy of Prehospital Triage in Selecting Severely Injured Trauma Patients.

JAMA Surg. 2018-4-1

[5]
Evaluation and Comparison of Different Prehospital Triage Scores of Trauma Patients on In-Hospital Mortality.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019-1-7

[6]
Field trauma triage: combining mechanism of injury with the prehospital index for an improved trauma triage tool.

J Trauma. 1997-8

[7]
A prospective comparison of paramedic judgment and the trauma triage rule in the prehospital setting.

Ann Emerg Med. 1994-11

[8]
Correlation Between the Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score: Implications for Prehospital Trauma Triage.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019

[9]
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Prehospital Triage of Trauma Patients.

JAMA Surg. 2019-5-1

[10]
Enhancing Performance of the National Field Triage Guidelines Using Machine Learning: Development of a Prehospital Triage Model to Predict Severe Trauma.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-9-30

引用本文的文献

[1]
The impact of shift work on paramedics and their practice: Protocol for a simulated paramedic shift work study.

PLoS One. 2025-3-26

[2]
Criteria for trauma team activation and staffing requirements for the management of patients with (suspected) multiple and/or severe injuries in the resuscitation room- a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025-3-18

[3]
Acil servis tanıları ile paramediklerin ilk değerlendirme tanılarının karşılaştırılması.

Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024-8

[4]
The prediction of the survival in patients with severe trauma during prehospital care: Analyses based on NTDB database.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024-8

[5]
Accuracy of Trauma on Scene Triage Screening Tool (Shock Index, Reverse Shock Index Glasgow Coma Scale and National Early Warning Score) to Predict the Severity of Emergency Department Triage: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Open Access Emerg Med. 2023-3-21

[6]
Prehospital triage tools across the world: a scoping review of the published literature.

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022-4-27

[7]
The national trauma triage protocol: how EMS perspective can inform the guideline revision.

Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022-1-18

[8]
Defining major trauma: a literature review.

Br Paramed J. 2019-6-1

[9]
How Well Do EMS Providers Predict Intracranial Hemorrhage in Head-Injured Older Adults?

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019-4-23

[10]
Accuracy of Prehospital Triage in Selecting Severely Injured Trauma Patients.

JAMA Surg. 2018-4-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索