Code Chris, Torney Alison, Gildea-Howardine Eleanor, Willmes Klaus
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Semin Speech Lang. 2010 Feb;31(1):21-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244950. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
We examined the outcome of a 1-month intensive treatment block for people with chronic aphasia. The selected participants were eight chronically impaired people (mean months post-onset [MPO], 34). We conducted pre- and post-treatment assessments using the English-language version of the Aachen Aphasia Test (EAAT) and the Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI). The group had significant overall improvement following treatment, which was maintained for 1 month, most significant changes seen on the EAAT were mainly in naming, comprehension, and reading and writing. Improvement was also observed on the CETI. Individual responses to treatment were variable, with some participants making more progress than others. Although the more mildly aphasic participant made most gains overall, the most severe and oldest participant made the most gains. We observed significant improvement in some subtests for some participants 1 month after treatment had ceased, suggesting a delayed effect of treatment. We conclude that short-term blocks of intensive treatment for chronically aphasic individuals can be effective.
我们研究了针对慢性失语症患者进行的为期1个月强化治疗阶段的效果。选定的参与者为8名慢性功能受损者(平均发病后月数[MPO]为34个月)。我们使用英文版的亚琛失语症测试(EAAT)和沟通有效性指数(CETI)进行了治疗前和治疗后的评估。该组在治疗后有显著的总体改善,且持续了1个月,在EAAT上看到的最显著变化主要在命名、理解以及读写方面。在CETI上也观察到了改善。个体对治疗的反应各不相同,一些参与者比其他参与者进步更大。虽然失语程度较轻的参与者总体上进步最大,但最严重且年龄最大的参与者进步也最大。我们观察到,在治疗停止1个月后,部分参与者在一些子测试中有显著改善,这表明治疗存在延迟效应。我们得出结论,对慢性失语症个体进行短期强化治疗阶段可能是有效的。