Suppr超能文献

对存在疑似执业问题的医生的评估与补救:一项国际调查。

Assessment and remediation for physicians with suspected performance problems: an international survey.

作者信息

Humphrey Charlotte

机构信息

Division of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8HA, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Winter;30(1):26-36. doi: 10.1002/chp.20053.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about the overall appropriateness and value of the various programs available internationally for assessment and remediation for individual physicians whose performance in their clinical practice has been identified as giving cause for concern.

METHOD

A questionnaire was e-mailed to members of the International Physicians Assessment Coalition and/or the Coalition for Physician Enhancement--organizations that were thought to provide this type of assessment (n = 20). Questions covered the aims, organization, methods, and outcomes of assessment programs and associated remediation.

RESULTS

Responses came from 15 regulatory bodies, universities, not-for-profits, and health service organizations in 5 countries. The assessment programs and remediation activities identified were small in scale. Their focus ranged from a narrow concern with identifying and repairing specific knowledge and skills deficits to a wider interest in the biopsychosocial functioning of the physician as a whole. Both "diagnosis" and "treatment" of problems focused on the individual physician. Less attention was given to broader systems or contextual factors that might impact performance. Although progress through remediation was carefully monitored, none of the programs undertook regular systematic follow-up to ascertain the success of their interventions in the longer term.

DISCUSSION

This field of activity is characterized by the use of sophisticated methods for measuring performance/competence, but provision of remediation is more patchy and variable. The small scale of these programs raises questions about the relationship between scale of provision and potential need for remediation. Gaps in information about impact and outcomes mean that the overall impact and value of this type of assessment and remediation is hard to determine.

摘要

引言

对于国际上现有的针对临床实践表现令人担忧的个体医生的各种评估和补救项目的总体适宜性和价值,人们了解甚少。

方法

通过电子邮件向国际医生评估联盟和/或医生提升联盟的成员发送了一份调查问卷,这些组织被认为提供此类评估(n = 20)。问题涵盖了评估项目及相关补救措施的目标、组织、方法和结果。

结果

来自5个国家的15个监管机构、大学、非营利组织和卫生服务组织回复了问卷。所确定的评估项目和补救活动规模较小。其关注点从狭隘地关注识别和修复特定的知识和技能缺陷到更广泛地关注医生整体的生物心理社会功能。问题的“诊断”和“治疗”都集中在个体医生身上。对可能影响表现的更广泛的系统或背景因素关注较少。尽管对补救过程进行了仔细监测,但没有一个项目进行定期的系统跟踪,以确定其干预措施在长期内的成功与否。

讨论

该活动领域的特点是使用复杂的方法来衡量表现/能力,但补救措施的提供则更加零散和多变。这些项目的小规模引发了关于提供规模与补救潜在需求之间关系的问题。关于影响和结果的信息空白意味着这类评估和补救的总体影响和价值难以确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验