• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂不影响脑出血患者的预后。

Prior use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors does not affect outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

作者信息

Eichel Roni, Khouri Salim T, Cohen Jose E, Ben-Hur Tamir, Paniri Ruth, Keidar Michal, Leker Ronen R

机构信息

Cerebrovascular Service and the Periz and Chantel Sheinberg Cerebrovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Israel.

出版信息

Neurol Res. 2010 Nov;32(9):905-9. doi: 10.1179/016164110X12656393664928. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1179/016164110X12656393664928
PMID:20223095
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) exert protective effects in patients with stroke but their effects remain unknown in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

We recruited consecutive patients with acute ICH and analysed pre-admission demographic variables and drug therapy as well as clinical and radiological parameters. Functional and neurological outcomes were determined with the modified Rankin score (mRS) and the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score administered 90 days after ICH.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ninety-nine patients were included over 6 years with a mortality rate of 47.3%. Before ICH, 130 patients (32.6%) used ACEI. ACEI-treated patients more often had vascular co-morbidities and were more frequently treated with anti-platelets. Admission NIHSS scores were significantly higher in ACEI-treated patients but 90 days NIHSS scores were not. Improvement from baseline NIHSS scores was significantly larger in ACEI-treated patients. Pre-ICH use of ACEI was not associated with lower mortality or better functional outcome on univariate analysis. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, controlling for possible confounding variables, ACEI use was not associated with increased chances for good outcome and failed to show an influence on mortality.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, our study does not support a possible neuroprotective effect for ACEI use prior to the occurrence of ICH.

摘要

背景与目的

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)对中风患者具有保护作用,但其对脑出血(ICH)患者的影响尚不清楚。

方法

我们连续招募急性脑出血患者,分析入院前的人口统计学变量、药物治疗以及临床和影像学参数。采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)和脑出血90天后的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分来确定功能和神经学预后。

结果

6年期间共纳入399例患者,死亡率为47.3%。脑出血前,130例患者(32.6%)使用ACEI。使用ACEI治疗的患者更常伴有血管合并症,且更频繁地接受抗血小板治疗。ACEI治疗组患者入院时的NIHSS评分显著更高,但90天时的NIHSS评分无差异。ACEI治疗组患者从基线NIHSS评分的改善情况显著更大。单因素分析显示,脑出血前使用ACEI与较低死亡率或更好的功能预后无关。多变量逻辑回归分析在控制可能的混杂变量后,使用ACEI与良好预后机会增加无关,且未显示对死亡率有影响。

讨论

总之,我们的研究不支持在脑出血发生前使用ACEI可能具有神经保护作用这一观点。

相似文献

1
Prior use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors does not affect outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.既往使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂不影响脑出血患者的预后。
Neurol Res. 2010 Nov;32(9):905-9. doi: 10.1179/016164110X12656393664928. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
2
Effect of pre-stroke use of ACE inhibitors on ischemic stroke severity.中风前使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对缺血性中风严重程度的影响。
BMC Neurol. 2005 Jun 10;5(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-5-10.
3
Use of the original, modified, or new intracerebral hemorrhage score to predict mortality and morbidity after intracerebral hemorrhage.使用原始、改良或新的脑出血评分来预测脑出血后的死亡率和发病率。
Stroke. 2003 Jul;34(7):1717-22. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000078657.22835.B9. Epub 2003 Jun 12.
4
Prior use of statins improves outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: prospective data from the National Acute Stroke Israeli Surveys (NASIS).既往使用他汀类药物可改善脑出血患者的预后:来自以色列国家急性卒中调查(NASIS)的前瞻性数据。
Stroke. 2009 Jul;40(7):2581-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.546259. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
5
Should ischemic stroke patients with aphasia or high National Institutes of Health stroke scale score undergo preprocedural intubation and endovascular treatment?伴有失语或 NIHSS 评分较高的缺血性脑卒中患者是否应进行术前插管和血管内治疗?
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 May-Jun;23(5):e299-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.12.009. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
6
Prior use of statins and outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage.他汀类药物的先前使用与脑出血患者的结局。
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Jan;17(1):78-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02747.x. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
7
Antiplatelets, ACE inhibitors, and statins combination reduces stroke severity and tissue at risk.抗血小板药物、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和他汀类药物联合使用可降低中风严重程度和风险组织。
Neurology. 2006 Apr 25;66(8):1153-8; discussion 1135. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000208406.45440.84.
8
Low cholesterol level associated with severity and outcome of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: Results from Taiwan Stroke Registry.低胆固醇水平与自发性脑出血的严重程度及预后的关系:来自台湾卒中登记处的结果
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 19;12(4):e0171379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171379. eCollection 2017.
9
The impact of intracranial carotid artery calcification on the development of thrombolysis-induced intracerebral hemorrhage.颅内颈动脉硬化对溶栓后引起的脑出血的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013 Nov;22(8):e455-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
10
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor usage and acute kidney injury: a secondary analysis of RENAL study outcomes.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的使用与急性肾损伤:RENAL研究结果的二次分析
Nephrology (Carlton). 2014 Oct;19(10):617-22. doi: 10.1111/nep.12284.

引用本文的文献

1
Zebrafish drug screening identifies candidate therapies for neuroprotection after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage.斑马鱼药物筛选鉴定自发性脑出血后神经保护的候选治疗方法。
Dis Model Mech. 2022 Mar 1;15(3). doi: 10.1242/dmm.049227. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
2
Usage of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker in Hypertension Intracerebral Hemorrhage.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂在高血压性脑出血中的应用
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Feb 9;17:355-363. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S291624. eCollection 2021.
3
Genetic Associations of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme with Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Meta-analysis.
血管紧张素转换酶与原发性脑出血的遗传关联:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 27;8(6):e67402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067402. Print 2013.