Institut für Humanernährung und Lebensmittelkunde, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Germany.
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Nov;18(11):2111-7. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.49. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
Pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) is positively associated with fatty liver and obesity-related insulin resistance. Because PAT is a well-known marker of visceral adiposity, we investigated the impact of weight loss on PAT and its relationship with liver fat and insulin sensitivity independently of body fat distribution. Thirty overweight nondiabetic women (BMI 28.2-46.8 kg/m(2), 22-41 years) followed a 14.2 ± 4-weeks low-calorie diet. PAT, abdominal subcutaneous (SAT), and visceral fat volumes (VAT) were measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), total fat mass, trunk, and leg fat by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and intrahepatocellular lipids (IHCL) by ((1))H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (M) and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA(IR)) were used to assess insulin sensitivity or insulin resistance. At baseline, PAT correlated with VAT (r = 0.82; P < 0.001), IHCL (r = 0.46), HOMA(IR) (r = 0.46), and M value (r = -0.40; all P < 0.05). During intervention, body weight decreased by -8.5%, accompanied by decreases of -12% PAT, -13% VAT, -44% IHCL, -10% HOMA2-%B, and +24% as well as +15% increases in HOMA2-%S and M, respectively. Decreases in PAT were only correlated with baseline PAT and the loss in VAT (r = -0.56; P < 0.01; r = 0.42; P < 0.05) but no associations with liver fat or indexes of insulin sensitivity were observed. Improvements in HOMA(IR) and HOMA2-%B were only related to the decrease in IHCL (r = 0.62, P < 0.01; r = 0.65, P = 0.002) and decreases in IHCL only correlated with the decrease in VAT (r = 0.61, P = 0.004). In conclusion, cross-sectionally PAT is correlated with VAT, liver fat, and insulin resistance. Longitudinally, the association between PAT and insulin resistance was lost suggesting no causal relationship between the two.
心包间脂肪组织(PAT)与脂肪肝和肥胖相关的胰岛素抵抗呈正相关。由于 PAT 是内脏肥胖的一个众所周知的标志物,我们研究了减肥对 PAT 的影响及其与肝脂肪和胰岛素敏感性的关系,而不考虑体脂分布。30 名超重的非糖尿病女性(BMI 28.2-46.8kg/m2,22-41 岁)接受了 14.2±4 周的低热量饮食。通过磁共振成像(MRI)测量 PAT、腹部皮下(SAT)和内脏脂肪体积(VAT),通过双能 X 射线吸收法测量总脂肪质量、躯干和腿部脂肪,通过(1)H 磁共振波谱法测量肝内脂肪(IHCL)。通过葡萄糖正常的高胰岛素钳夹(M)和稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA(IR))评估胰岛素敏感性或胰岛素抵抗。在基线时,PAT 与 VAT(r = 0.82;P < 0.001)、IHCL(r = 0.46)、HOMA(IR)(r = 0.46)和 M 值(r = -0.40;所有 P < 0.05)相关。在干预过程中,体重下降了-8.5%,同时 PAT 下降了-12%,VAT 下降了-13%,IHCL 下降了-44%,HOMA2-%B 下降了-10%,HOMA2-%S 和 M 分别增加了+24%和+15%。PAT 的下降仅与基线 PAT 和 VAT 的减少相关(r = -0.56;P < 0.01;r = 0.42;P < 0.05),但与肝脂肪或胰岛素敏感性指标无关。HOMA(IR)和 HOMA2-%B 的改善仅与 IHCL 的减少相关(r = 0.62,P < 0.01;r = 0.65,P = 0.002),而 IHCL 的减少仅与 VAT 的减少相关(r = 0.61,P = 0.004)。总之,PAT 与 VAT、肝脂肪和胰岛素抵抗呈横断面相关。纵向研究表明,PAT 与胰岛素抵抗之间的关联消失,提示两者之间没有因果关系。