Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
Mod Rheumatol. 2010 Aug;20(4):337-42. doi: 10.1007/s10165-010-0284-8. Epub 2010 Mar 13.
We conducted a 1-year prospective study to clarify differences between the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) and the modified HAQ (mHAQ) score among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with infliximab. A total of 87 patients were scheduled to receive infliximab infusion at a dose of 3 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, and 6, and every 8 weeks thereafter for 54 weeks; all patients received a full examination at each infusion appointment. The 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) and functional capability of each patient was assessed at each visit, using the HAQ-DI and the mHAQ score. A strong correlation was observed between the HAQ-DI and the mHAQ score at baseline (r = 0.892). Over the course of the treatment, the mean mHAQ score changed similarly to the HAQ-DI, but the mean HAQ-DI was significantly higher than the mean mHAQ score at each time-point (for the HAQ-DI vs. mHAQ score, baseline: 1.5 +/- 0.7 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.6, p < 0.0001; 6 weeks: 1.1 +/- 0.7 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.5, p < 0.0001; 30 weeks: 1.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.5, p < 0.0001; 54 weeks: 0.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.6, p = 0.0006). In the categories of "eating", "reaching", and "other activities", the scores for several items excluded from the mHAQ score were significantly higher than those included in the mHAQ score over the year-long study period. We identified items contributing to significant differences between the HAQ-DI and the mHAQ score among RA patients treated with infliximab.
我们进行了一项为期 1 年的前瞻性研究,旨在阐明接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中健康评估问卷残疾指数(HAQ-DI)和改良 HAQ(mHAQ)评分之间的差异。共有 87 例患者计划在 0、2 和 6 周时接受 3mg/kg 的英夫利昔单抗输注,此后每 8 周输注一次,共 54 周;所有患者在每次输注时都进行了全面检查。在每次就诊时,使用 HAQ-DI 和 mHAQ 评分评估每个患者的 28 个关节疾病活动度(DAS28)和功能能力。基线时,HAQ-DI 和 mHAQ 评分之间观察到强相关性(r = 0.892)。在治疗过程中,mHAQ 评分的平均值与 HAQ-DI 相似,但在每个时间点,HAQ-DI 的平均值均显著高于 mHAQ 评分(HAQ-DI 与 mHAQ 评分相比,基线:1.5 +/- 0.7 vs. 0.9 +/- 0.6,p < 0.0001;6 周:1.1 +/- 0.7 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.5,p < 0.0001;30 周:1.0 +/- 0.7 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.5,p < 0.0001;54 周:0.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.6,p = 0.0006)。在“进食”、“伸手”和“其他活动”等类别中,mHAQ 评分中排除的几个项目的得分在长达 1 年的研究期间均显著高于包含在 mHAQ 评分中的得分。我们确定了导致接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的 RA 患者 HAQ-DI 和 mHAQ 评分之间存在显著差异的项目。