Suppr超能文献

在一种社会性阿米巴中,欺骗并不能解释高和低亲缘关系下的选择差异。

Cheating does not explain selective differences at high and low relatedness in a social amoeba.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology MS 170, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA.

出版信息

BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Mar 12;10:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-76.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Altruism can be favored by high relatedness among interactants. We tested the effect of relatedness in experimental populations of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum, where altruism occurs in a starvation-induced social stage when some amoebae die to form a stalk that lifts the fertile spores above the soil facilitating dispersal. The single cells that aggregate during the social stage can be genetically diverse, which can lead to conflict over spore and stalk allocation. We mixed eight genetically distinct wild isolates and maintained twelve replicated populations at a high and a low relatedness treatment. After one and ten social generations we assessed the strain composition of the populations. We expected that some strains would be out-competed in both treatments. In addition, we expected that low relatedness might allow the persistence of social cheaters as it provides opportunity to exploit other strains.

RESULTS

We found that at high relatedness a single clone prevailed in all twelve populations. At low relatedness three clones predominated in all twelve populations. Interestingly, exploitation of some clones by others in the social stage did not explain the results. When we mixed each winner against the pool of five losers, the winner did not prevail in the spores because all contributed fairly to the stalk and spores. Furthermore, the dominant clone at high-relatedness was not cheated by the other two that persisted at low relatedness. A combination of high spore production and short unicellular stage most successfully explained the three successful clones at low relatedness, but not why one of them fared better at high relatedness. Differences in density did not account for the results, as the clones did not differ in vegetative growth rates nor did they change the growth rates over relevant densities.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that social competition and something beyond solitary growth differences occurs during the vegetative stage when amoebae eat bacteria and divide by binary fission. The high degree of repeatability of our results indicates that these effects are strong and points to the importance of new approaches to studying interactions in D. discoideum.

摘要

背景

利他主义可以在相互作用者之间的高亲缘关系中得到青睐。我们在实验种群中测试了亲缘关系的影响,这种关系发生在一种饥饿诱导的社会阶段,在这个阶段,一些变形虫死亡形成一个柄,将肥沃的孢子举过土壤,促进传播。在社会阶段聚集的单细胞可以是遗传多样的,这可能导致在孢子和柄分配上产生冲突。我们混合了八个遗传上不同的野生分离物,并在高和亲缘关系处理下维持了 12 个重复种群。在一个和十个社会世代后,我们评估了种群的菌株组成。我们预计一些菌株在两种处理中都会被淘汰。此外,我们预计低亲缘关系可能允许社会骗子的存在,因为它提供了利用其他菌株的机会。

结果

我们发现,在高亲缘关系下,12 个种群中都只有一个克隆占主导地位。在低亲缘关系下,12 个种群中都有三个克隆占主导地位。有趣的是,在社会阶段对其他克隆的利用并不能解释结果。当我们将每个胜利者与五名失败者的混合体进行比较时,胜利者在孢子中并没有占优势,因为所有的孢子都公平地为柄和孢子做出了贡献。此外,在高亲缘关系下占主导地位的克隆并没有被其他两个在低亲缘关系下仍然存在的克隆所欺骗。高孢子产量和单细胞阶段短的组合最成功地解释了低亲缘关系下的三个成功克隆,但并不能解释为什么其中一个在高亲缘关系下表现更好。密度差异并不能解释结果,因为克隆在营养生长率上没有差异,也没有改变在相关密度下的生长率。

结论

这些结果表明,在变形虫吃细菌并通过二分法分裂进行营养生长的阶段,社会竞争和一些超越孤立生长差异的因素在起作用。我们结果的高度可重复性表明这些影响是强大的,并指向了研究 D. discoideum 相互作用的新方法的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8861/2848656/e3ec1ace753a/1471-2148-10-76-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验