Institute of Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg, Germany.
Acta Trop. 2010 Sep;115(3):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
The parasitic diseases which we know today as cystic and alveolar echinococcosis are zoonoses known since antique times, and 1855, respectively. Whether the two clinically and morphologically distinct diseases were caused, according to a "unicistic" and a "dualistic" theory, by only one or two different cestode species was the subject of a fierce, 100 years long debate involving scientists from many countries. The natural life cycle of Echinococcus granulosus was fully clarified in 1855 after successful animal experiments. In contrast, the natural final and intermediate hosts of Echinococcus multilocularis remained unknown, and the advocates of either theory had to draw on a number of surrogate arguments to defend their positions. The seesaw of reasoning and mutual defeats of the two theories, and the final recognition of E. multilocularis as an independent species in the 1950s are described in this article.
我们今天所知的囊型和泡型包虫病是自古以来就有的寄生虫病,分别于 1855 年被发现。这两种在临床上和形态学上截然不同的疾病,是由一种或两种不同的带绦虫引起的,还是由两种不同的带绦虫引起的,这是一个“一元论”和“二元论”理论,这是一个激烈的、持续了 100 年的争论,涉及到来自许多国家的科学家。1855 年,在成功的动物实验后,细粒棘球绦虫的自然生活史得到了充分阐明。相比之下,泡状棘球蚴的天然终末和中间宿主仍然未知,两种理论的支持者不得不引用一些替代论据来捍卫自己的立场。本文描述了两种理论的推理拉锯战和相互失败,以及在 20 世纪 50 年代最终将泡状棘球蚴确认为一个独立的物种。