• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平面平行电离室在电子束中的替换修正因子。

Replacement correction factors for plane-parallel ion chambers in electron beams.

机构信息

Ottawa Carleton Institute of Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):461-5. doi: 10.1118/1.3276735.

DOI:10.1118/1.3276735
PMID:20229854
Abstract

PURPOSE

Plane-parallel chambers are recommended by dosimetry protocols for measurements in (especially low-energy) electron beams. In dosimetry protocols, the replacement correction factor P(repl) is assumed unity for "well-guarded" plane-parallel chambers in electron beams when the front face of the cavity is the effective point of measurement. There is experimental evidence that ion chambers which are not well-guarded (e.g., Markus) have nonunity P(repl) values. Monte Carlo simulations are employed in this study to investigate the replacement correction factors for plane-parallel chambers in electron beams.

METHODS

Using previously established Monte Carlo calculation methods, the values of P(repl) are calculated with high statistical precision for the cavities of a variety of plane-parallel chambers in a water phantom irradiated by various electron beams. The dependences of the values of P(repl) on the beam quality, phantom depth, as well as the guard ring width are studied.

RESULTS

In the dose fall-off region for low-energy beams, the P(repl) values are very sensitive to depth. It is found that this is mainly due to the gradient effect, which originates from the fact that the effective point of measurement for many plane-parallel chambers should not be at the front face of the cavity but rather shifted toward the center of the cavity by a fraction of a millimeter. Using the front face of the cavity as the effective point of measurement, the calculated values of P(repl) at d(ref) are not unity for some well-guarded plane-parallel chambers. The calculated P(repl) values for the Roos chamber are close to 1 for all electron beams. The calculation results for the Markus chamber are in good agreement with the measured values.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate selection of the effective point of measurement for plane-parallel chambers in electron beams is an important issue. If the effective point of measurement is correctly accounted for, the P(repl) values would be almost independent of depth. Both the guard ring width and the ratio of the collecting volume diameter to the cavity thickness can influence the values of P(repl) For a diameter to thickness ratio of 5 (e.g., NACP02 chamber), the guard width has to be 6 mm for the chamber to be considered as well-guarded, i.e., have a P(repl) value of 1.00.

摘要

目的

剂量学协议推荐在(特别是低能)电子束中使用平行平板室进行测量。在剂量学协议中,当腔的前表面是有效测量点时,对于“保护良好”的平行平板室,假设空腔替换校正因子 P(repl)为单位。有实验证据表明,未受良好保护的电离室(例如 Markus)的 P(repl)值不为单位。本研究采用蒙特卡罗模拟方法研究电子束中平行平板室的替换校正因子。

方法

使用先前建立的蒙特卡罗计算方法,在水模中用各种电子束照射各种平行平板室的腔室,以高精度统计计算 P(repl)的值。研究了 P(repl)值随束质、体模深度以及保护环宽度的依赖性。

结果

在低能束的剂量下降区域,P(repl)值对深度非常敏感。研究发现,这主要是由于梯度效应,该效应源于这样一个事实,即许多平行平板室的有效测量点不应在腔室的前表面,而是应该通过几毫米的分数向腔室的中心移动。如果将腔室的前表面用作有效测量点,则对于某些保护良好的平行平板室,在 d(ref)处计算出的 P(repl)值不为单位。对于所有电子束,Roos 室的计算出的 P(repl)值接近 1。对于 Markus 室,计算结果与测量值吻合良好。

结论

在电子束中正确选择平行平板室的有效测量点是一个重要问题。如果正确考虑了有效测量点,P(repl)值将几乎与深度无关。保护环宽度和收集体积直径与腔室厚度的比值都可以影响 P(repl)值。对于直径与厚度比为 5(例如,NACP02 室)的情况,为了将腔室视为保护良好,即具有 P(repl)值为 1.00,保护环的宽度必须为 6 毫米。

相似文献

1
Replacement correction factors for plane-parallel ion chambers in electron beams.平面平行电离室在电子束中的替换修正因子。
Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):461-5. doi: 10.1118/1.3276735.
2
Study of the effective point of measurement for ion chambers in electron beams by Monte Carlo simulation.通过蒙特卡罗模拟研究电子束中电离室的有效测量点
Med Phys. 2009 Jun;36(6):2034-42. doi: 10.1118/1.3121490.
3
Calculation of the replacement correction factors for ion chambers in megavoltage beams by Monte Carlo simulation.通过蒙特卡罗模拟计算兆伏级射束中电离室的替换校正因子。
Med Phys. 2008 May;35(5):1747-55. doi: 10.1118/1.2898139.
4
Monte Carlo calculations of correction factors for plane-parallel ionization chambers in clinical electron dosimetry.临床电子剂量学中平行板电离室校正因子的蒙特卡罗计算。
Med Phys. 2008 Sep;35(9):4033-40. doi: 10.1118/1.2968102.
5
Replacement correction factors for cylindrical ion chambers in electron beams.电子束中圆柱形电离室的替换校正因子。
Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4600-8. doi: 10.1118/1.3213094.
6
Effective point of measurement for parallel plate and cylindrical ion chambers in megavoltage electron beams.兆伏级电子束中平行板电离室和圆柱形电离室的有效测量点
Z Med Phys. 2014 Sep;24(3):216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
7
Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.几种电离室类型电子束质量转换因子的蒙特卡罗计算
Med Phys. 2014 Nov;41(11):111701. doi: 10.1118/1.4893915.
8
Monte Carlo study of the depth-dependent fluence perturbation in parallel-plate ionization chambers in electron beams.电子束中平行板电离室深度相关注量扰动的蒙特卡罗研究
Med Phys. 2014 Nov;41(11):111707. doi: 10.1118/1.4897389.
9
An experimental study of recombination and polarity effect in a set of customized plane parallel ionization chambers.一组定制平面平行电离室中复合与极性效应的实验研究。
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2006 Dec;29(4):291-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03178393.
10
Monte Carlo calculations for reference dosimetry of electron beams with the PTW Roos and NE2571 ion chambers.PTW Roos 和 NE2571 电离室用于电子束参考剂量学的蒙特卡罗计算。
Med Phys. 2013 Dec;40(12):121722. doi: 10.1118/1.4829577.

引用本文的文献

1
Electron beam reference dosimetry measurements obtained at multiple institutions using the Addendum to AAPM's TG-51 protocol.多机构依据美国医学物理师协会(AAPM)TG - 51协议附录进行的电子束参考剂量测定测量。
Med Phys. 2025 Jun;52(6):4971-4983. doi: 10.1002/mp.17802. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
Toward real-time Monte Carlo simulation using a commercial cloud computing infrastructure.利用商业云计算基础设施实现实时蒙特卡罗模拟。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Sep 7;56(17):N175-81. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/17/N02. Epub 2011 Aug 12.