Suppr超能文献

接受螨舌下免疫治疗的患者对Pen a 1无新的致敏反应。

Lack of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 in patients treated with mite sublingual immunotherapy.

作者信息

Rossi Renato E, Monasterolo Giorgio, Incorvaia Cristoforo, Moingeon Philippe, Frati Franco, Passalacqua Giovanni, Rossi Lucilla, Canonica Giorgio W

机构信息

Allergy Unit, National Health Service, Rete di Allergologia Regione Piemonte, Cuneo 1, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Mol Allergy. 2010 Mar 15;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1476-7961-8-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some studies reported the possible induction of food allergy, caused by neo-sensitization to cross-reacting allergens, during immunotherapy with aeroallergens, while other studies ruled out such possibility.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of neo-sensitization to Pen a 1 (tropomyosin) as well as the appearance of reactions after ingestion of foods containing tropomyosin as a consequence of sublingual mite immunization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specific IgE to Tropomyosin (rPen a 1) before and after mite sublingual immunotherapy in 134 subjects were measured. IgE-specific antibodies for mite extract and recombinant allergen Pen a 1 were evaluated using the immunoenzymatic CAP system (Phadia Diagnostics, Milan, Italy).

RESULTS

All patients had rPen a 1 IgE negative results before and after mite SLIT and did not show positive shrimp extract skin reactivity and serological rPen a 1 IgE conversion after treatment. More important, no patient showed systemic reactions to crustacean ingestion.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients did not show neo-sensitization to tropomyosin, a component of the extract (namely mite group 10) administered. An assessment of a patient's possible pre-existing sensitisation to tropomyosin by skin test and/or specific IgE prior to start mite extract immunotherapy is recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered in EudraCT, with the ID number of 2010-02035531.

摘要

背景

一些研究报告称,在气传变应原免疫治疗期间,对交叉反应性变应原的新致敏可能引发食物过敏,而其他研究则排除了这种可能性。

目的

本研究旨在评估经舌下螨免疫治疗后对Pen a 1(原肌球蛋白)新致敏的发生情况,以及摄入含原肌球蛋白食物后反应的出现情况。

材料与方法

检测了134名受试者在螨舌下免疫治疗前后针对原肌球蛋白(重组Pen a 1)的特异性IgE。使用免疫酶联CAP系统(意大利米兰法迪亚诊断公司)评估螨提取物和重组变应原Pen a 1的IgE特异性抗体。

结果

所有患者在螨舌下免疫治疗前后rPen a 1 IgE结果均为阴性,治疗后未出现虾提取物皮肤反应阳性及血清rPen a 1 IgE转换。更重要的是,没有患者在摄入甲壳类食物后出现全身反应。

结论

患者未对所给予提取物(即螨第10组)的成分原肌球蛋白产生新致敏。建议在开始螨提取物免疫治疗前,通过皮肤试验和/或特异性IgE对患者可能预先存在的原肌球蛋白致敏情况进行评估。

试验注册

本试验已在欧洲临床试验数据库(EudraCT)注册,注册号为2010 - 02035531。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Shellfish and House Dust Mite Allergies: Is the Link Tropomyosin?贝类和屋尘螨过敏:联系在于原肌球蛋白吗?
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2016 Mar;8(2):101-6. doi: 10.4168/aair.2016.8.2.101. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

本文引用的文献

2
Allergen immunotherapy: a practice parameter second update.变应原免疫疗法:实践参数第二次更新
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Sep;120(3 Suppl):S25-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.06.019.
3
The burden of allergic rhinitis.过敏性鼻炎的负担。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):3-9. doi: 10.2500/aap.2007.28.2934.
9
Does SIT to Der p protect from snail sensitization?
Allergy. 2002 Sep;57(9):868-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.23575_12.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验