Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental Materials, Dental School, Christian-Albrechts University at Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0393-y. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
The purpose of this study was to compare the patients' and dentists' perception of dental appearance. Based on internationally accepted guidelines about dental esthetics, a questionnaire was developed to measure "dental appearance" (QDA). Eleven items defined a QDA sum score (0 = "absolutely satisfied", 44 = "absolutely dissatisfied"). The QDA was completed by 16 patients (eight women, eight men, mean age 63 ± 9 years) before and after a complete oral rehabilitation. Forty-two dentists evaluated the esthetics before and after rehabilitation on a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 = "absolutely unesthetic", 100 = "absolutely esthetic"). The patients' quoting showed a significant esthetic improvement (QDA sum score) from 22 before treatment to 3.5 after treatment (P ≤ 0.001). Although most of the dentists judged an improvement in most of the patients dental appearances, no significant correlation could be found between patients' and dentists' judgment regarding dental appearance (r = -0.13-0.53, P > 0.05). When evaluating the influence of age, gender, and experience on rating dental appearance, no significant differences (P > 0.05) could be found.
本研究旨在比较患者和牙医对牙齿美观的感知。基于国际公认的牙科美学指南,设计了一个问卷来衡量“牙齿美观”(QDA)。11 个项目定义了 QDA 总分(0=“绝对满意”,44=“绝对不满意”)。16 名患者(8 名女性,8 名男性,平均年龄 63±9 岁)在完成全面口腔修复治疗前后完成了 QDA。42 名牙医在治疗前后使用视觉模拟评分(VAS,0=“绝对不美观”,100=“绝对美观”)评估美学效果。患者的评价显示治疗前 QDA 总分为 22,治疗后为 3.5,有显著的美观改善(P≤0.001)。尽管大多数牙医判断大多数患者的牙齿美观都有所改善,但患者和牙医对牙齿美观的判断之间没有发现显著相关性(r=-0.13-0.53,P>0.05)。评估年龄、性别和经验对牙齿美观评价的影响时,未发现显著差异(P>0.05)。