Montgomery Erica C, Kunik Mark E, Wilson Nancy, Stanley Melinda A, Weiss Brandon
Houston Center for Quality of Care & Utilization Studies (MEDVAMC 152), 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Bull Menninger Clin. 2010 Winter;74(1):45-62. doi: 10.1521/bumc.2010.74.1.45.
Many studies support the effectiveness of paraprofessionals in administering psychotherapy. However, no review has compared the utility/efficacy of paraprofessionals versus professionals in administering cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT). This article systematically reviews published trials comparing outcomes of paraprofessional to professional therapists using CBT to treat anxiety and depressive symptoms. Four studies met inclusion criteria and are critiqued using evidence-based quality parameters. The authors conclude that paraprofessionals can be effective in delivering CBT to these patients, with outcomes comparable to those of professionals.
许多研究支持辅助专业人员进行心理治疗的有效性。然而,尚无综述比较辅助专业人员与专业人员在实施认知行为疗法(CBT)方面的效用/疗效。本文系统回顾了已发表的试验,这些试验比较了使用CBT治疗焦虑和抑郁症状的辅助专业治疗师与专业治疗师的治疗结果。四项研究符合纳入标准,并使用基于证据的质量参数进行了批判。作者得出结论,辅助专业人员在为这些患者提供CBT方面可能是有效的,其治疗结果与专业人员相当。