Peipert Allison, Rodriguez-Quintana Natalie, Lorenzo-Luaces Lorenzo
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan.
Int J Cogn Ther. 2022 Mar;15(1):94-113. doi: 10.1007/s41811-022-00131-3. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
Increased quality of life (QoL) is rated by patients as a primary factor in determining recovery from psychopathology. Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs) are the most well-researched psychotherapies for internalizing disorders and appear effective at reducing symptoms even when delivered by trainees. Existing research suggests that the effects of CBTs on QoL are more modest than their effects on symptoms. However, little is known about the effects of trainee-delivered CBT on life satisfaction, a subjective measure of QoL. We analyzed data from 93 clients treated by students (n=23) in a graduate-level training clinic using an intent-to-treat approach, completers case analyses, and random forest imputation. Across methods of handling missing data, improvements in anxiety, depression, and CBT skills were more marked than improvements in QoL. Exploratory analyses suggested baseline life satisfaction was the strongest predictor of end-of-treatment life satisfaction. Future research should explore alternatives to "standard" CBT for clients with low life satisfaction.
生活质量(QoL)的提高被患者视为决定从精神病理学中康复的主要因素。认知行为疗法(CBT)是针对内化障碍研究最为充分的心理疗法,即使由受训人员实施,似乎也能有效减轻症状。现有研究表明,CBT对生活质量的影响比对症状的影响更为有限。然而,对于受训人员实施的CBT对生活满意度(生活质量的主观衡量指标)的影响却知之甚少。我们采用意向性分析、完成者案例分析和随机森林插补法,分析了来自一家研究生水平培训诊所的93名接受学生治疗的客户(n = 23)的数据。在处理缺失数据的各种方法中,焦虑、抑郁和CBT技能的改善比生活质量的改善更为显著。探索性分析表明,基线生活满意度是治疗结束时生活满意度的最强预测因素。未来的研究应该探索针对生活满意度较低的客户的“标准”CBT替代方案。